Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

@@ Line 192: / Line 192: @@
 The [http://www.cua.org/en Canadian Urological Association] (2018) issued a 19-page guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision. The statement is very comprehensive and covers treatment of various diseases and deformities as well as discussing non-therapeutic circumicision of boys in Canada.
+* {{REFjournal
+ |last=Dave
+ |first=Sumit
+ |author-link=
+ |last2=Afshar
+ |first2=Kourash
+ |author2-link=
+ |last3=Braga
+ |first3=Luis
+ |author3-link=
+ |last4=Anderson
+ |first4=Peter
+ |author4-link=
+ |etal=no
+ |title=Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version)
+ |trans-title=
+ |language=English
+ |journal= Can Urol Assoc J
+ |location=
+ |date=2018-02
+ |volume=12
+ |issue=2
+ |pages=E76-99
+ |url=http://www.cua.org/themes/web/assets/files/g49_en_circumcision-new_logo_am.pdf
+ |archived=
+ |quote=
+ |pubmedID=29381458
+ |pubmedCID=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc5937400/
+ |DOI=/10.5489/cuaj.5033
+ |
+}}
@@ Line 208: / Line 241: @@
   |website=www.bma.org.uk
   |date=2019
- |accessdate=2020-07-30
   |format=PDF
   |quote=