Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions

Add text and link.
Add URL
Line 35: Line 35:
  |journal=J Sex Med
  |journal=J Sex Med
  |location=
  |location=
  |date=2014
  |date=2014-12
  |volume=11
  |volume=11
  |issue=
  |issue=12
  |pages=2847-64
  |pages=2847-64
  |url=
  |url=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Caroline_Pukall/publication/266564315_A_Review_of_the_Current_State_of_the_Male_Circumcision_Literature/links/59ed438a0f7e9bfdeb71aec7/A-Review-of-the-Current-State-of-the-Male-Circumcision-Literature.pdf
  |archived=
  |archived=
  |quote=
  |quote=
  |pubmedID=
  |pubmedID=25284631
  |pubmedCID=
  |pubmedCID=
  |DOI=10.1111/jsm.12703
  |DOI=10.1111/jsm.12703  
  |accessdate=2020-08-02
  |accessdate=2020-08-02
}}</ref>
}}</ref>