Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions
m →Non-US statements: introduced country subtitles |
m renamed subtitles |
||
| Line 322: | Line 322: | ||
}} | }} | ||
=== | === UK === | ||
The [https://www.bma.org.uk/ British Medical Association] 28-page statement (2019) focuses on legal and ethical advice to its fellows to help keep them out of trouble in a legal and regulatory environment that is increasingly unfriendly to practitioners of non-therapeutic male circumcision. It has little to say about the medical aspects of non-therapeutic circumcision. To its credit it cites the [https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents#aofs Human Rights Act 1998] and calls for practitioners to respect the child's rights under that act. | The [https://www.bma.org.uk/ British Medical Association] 28-page statement (2019) focuses on legal and ethical advice to its fellows to help keep them out of trouble in a legal and regulatory environment that is increasingly unfriendly to practitioners of non-therapeutic male circumcision. It has little to say about the medical aspects of non-therapeutic circumcision. To its credit it cites the [https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents#aofs Human Rights Act 1998] and calls for practitioners to respect the child's rights under that act. | ||
| Line 329: | Line 329: | ||
|archived= | |archived= | ||
|title=Non-therapeutic male circumcision (NTMC) of children – practical guidance for doctors | |title=Non-therapeutic male circumcision (NTMC) of children – practical guidance for doctors | ||
|last= | |last= | ||
|first= | |first= | ||
| Line 341: | Line 339: | ||
}} | }} | ||
=== | === USA === | ||
The United States are unique because the American medical industry has been promoting the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision since the late 19th Century.<ref>{{REFjournal | |||
The United States | |||
|last=Gollaher | |last=Gollaher | ||
|first=David | |first=David | ||
| Line 367: | Line 364: | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Circumcision in the United States | |title=Circumcision in the United States | ||
|journal=JAMA | |journal=JAMA | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
| Line 463: | Line 458: | ||
|last=Hill | |last=Hill | ||
|first=George | |first=George | ||
|author-link=George Hill | |||
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision | |publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision | ||
|format=PDF | |format=PDF | ||
| Line 468: | Line 464: | ||
|accessdate=2020-08-03 | |accessdate=2020-08-03 | ||
}} | }} | ||
* {{REFjournal | * {{REFjournal | ||
|last=Blank | |last=Blank | ||
| Line 500: | Line 494: | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Circumcision Policy Statement | |title=Circumcision Policy Statement | ||
|journal=Pediatrics | |journal=Pediatrics | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
| Line 516: | Line 508: | ||
|accessdate=2020-08-02 | |accessdate=2020-08-02 | ||
}} | }} | ||
* {{REFjournal | * {{REFjournal | ||
|last=Task Force on Circumcision | |last=Task Force on Circumcision | ||
| Line 523: | Line 514: | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Male Circumcision | |title=Male Circumcision | ||
|journal=Pediatrics | |journal=Pediatrics | ||
|location= | |location= | ||