New Zealand: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m Add categories. |
m adjusted REFjournal |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic medically unnecessary [[circumcision]] in New Zealand among white New Zealanders rose to about 95 percent in the 1940s. The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic circumcision started to decline about 1950. The decline seems to have been triggered by the publication of [[Douglas Gairdner]]'s classic 1949 paper, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision''.<ref name="gairdner1949">{{REFjournal | The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic medically unnecessary [[circumcision]] in New Zealand among white New Zealanders rose to about 95 percent in the 1940s. The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic circumcision started to decline about 1950. The decline seems to have been triggered by the publication of [[Douglas Gairdner]]'s classic 1949 paper, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision''.<ref name="gairdner1949">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Gairdner | |last=Gairdner | ||
| | |init=DM | ||
|author-link=Douglas Gairdner | |author-link=Douglas Gairdner | ||
|title=The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision | |title=The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision | ||
|journal=British Medical Journal | |journal=British Medical Journal | ||