American Academy of Family Physicians: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m typo
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m normalize et al. (AMA)
Line 175: Line 175:
  |DOI=10.1097/00006454-198908000-00041
  |DOI=10.1097/00006454-198908000-00041
  |accessdate=2020-04-18
  |accessdate=2020-04-18
}}</ref> The AAFP fails to inform parents of this conservative and satisfactory treatment. Singh-Grewal ''et al''. (2005) report 111 circumcisions would be necessary to prevent one UTI. Circumcision is recommended only in cases of recurrent UTI. the authors point out that the rate of complications of circumcision exceeds the rate of prevention of UTI, so there is no net benefit from neonatal non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal
}}</ref> The AAFP fails to inform parents of this conservative and satisfactory treatment. Singh-Grewal et al. (2005) report 111 circumcisions would be necessary to prevent one UTI. Circumcision is recommended only in cases of recurrent UTI. the authors point out that the rate of complications of circumcision exceeds the rate of prevention of UTI, so there is no net benefit from neonatal non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Singh-Grewal
  |last=Singh-Grewal
  |first=Davinder
  |first=Davinder