Sweden: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Legislation: Add text. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 270: | Line 270: | ||
The 2001 circumcision law makes non-therapeutic child [[circumcision]] somewhat safer because a licensed medical doctor must be in attendance. It requires the use of anaesthesia so the extreme [[pain| pain and trauma]] of child circumcision is reduced. However it stops short of protecting the [[human rights]] of the child. The child will still suffer harm due to the amputation of the multi-functional [[foreskin]] | The 2001 circumcision law makes non-therapeutic child [[circumcision]] somewhat safer because a licensed medical doctor must be in attendance. It requires the use of anaesthesia so the extreme [[pain| pain and trauma]] of child circumcision is reduced. However it stops short of protecting the [[human rights]] of the child. The child will still suffer harm due to the amputation of the multi-functional [[foreskin]] | ||
[[Sweden Democrats]] introduced a bill into the Riksdag on 24 September 2013 that would ban the non-therapeutic circumcision of boys.<ref>{{REFweb | [[Sverigedemokraterna| Sweden Democrats]] introduced a bill into the Riksdag on 24 September 2013 that would ban the non-therapeutic circumcision of boys.<ref>{{REFweb | ||
url=https://www.arclaw.org/news/good-news-from-sweden-officials-denounce-male-circumcision-and-bill-introduced-to-ban-circumcision | |||
|title=Bill Introduced to ban circumcision. | |title=Bill Introduced to ban circumcision. | ||
|last= | |last= | ||