Peter Kilmarx: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add publication. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add text and citation. |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
|accessdate=2022-09-14 | |accessdate=2022-09-14 | ||
}}</ref> There is substantial evidence that Kilmarx holds a high degree of [[bias]] in favor of [[circumcision]]. | }}</ref> There is substantial evidence that Kilmarx holds a high degree of [[bias]] in favor of [[circumcision]]. | ||
Fish et al. (2020) identify Kilmarx as a major architect of the CDC's erroneous circumcision promotion policy with its racist orientation.<ref>{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Fish | |||
|first=Max | |||
|init= | |||
|author-link=Max Fish | |||
|last2=Shavisi | |||
|first2=Ariane | |||
|init2= | |||
|author2-link= | |||
|last3=Gwaambuka | |||
|first3=Tatenda | |||
|init3= | |||
|author3-link= | |||
|last4=Tangwa | |||
|first4=Godfrey B. | |||
|init4= | |||
|author4-link= | |||
|last5=Ncayiyana | |||
|first5=Daniel | |||
|init5= | |||
|author5-link= | |||
|last6=Earp | |||
|first6=Brian D. | |||
|init6= | |||
|author6-link=Brian D. Earp | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=A new Tuskegee? Unethical human experimentation and Western neocolonialism in the mass circumcision of African men. | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=Dev World Bioeth | |||
|location= | |||
|date=2021-12 | |||
|volume=21 | |||
|issue=4 | |||
|article= | |||
|page= | |||
|pages=211-26 | |||
|url= | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=32909369 | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI=10.1111/dewb.12285 | |||
|accessdate=2022-09-27 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
{{PUB}} | {{PUB}} | ||
Kilmarx is a very active writer. He is listed as as author or co-author of [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Peter+Kilmarx 121 articles] by the PubMed service of the National Library of Medicine. Some are very pro-circumcision. | Kilmarx is a very active writer. He is listed as as author or co-author of [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Peter+Kilmarx 121 articles] by the PubMed service of the National Library of Medicine. Some are very pro-circumcision. | ||