Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Review of the circumcision literature: Add text. |
||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
|accessdate=2020-08-02 | |accessdate=2020-08-02 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Bossio ''et al''. made three recommendations: | |||
1. That more rigours and consistent methodology be used. | |||
2. Empirically rigorous studies of the physiological effects of neonatal circumcision are needed. | |||
3.Psychosocial factors, including sexual correlates of circumcision, should be studied. | |||
To carry out the recommendations of the authors it would be necessary to violate the rights of more boys who would be permanently injured by circumcision. | |||
==Statements from medical trade associations== | ==Statements from medical trade associations== | ||