Sexual injury of circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Female preferences and response: Relocate text. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 656: | Line 656: | ||
==Female preferences and response== | ==Female preferences and response== | ||
Wildman | Wildman & Wildman (1976) surveyed 55 young women in Georgia, US, reporting that 47 (89%) of respondents preferred the circumcised penis (the remainder preferred the uncircumcised penis).<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Wildman | |last=Wildman | ||
|first=R.W. | |first=R.W. | ||
| Line 699: | Line 699: | ||
|accessdate=2020-04-27 | |accessdate=2020-04-27 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Boyle & Bensley (2001) reported that the lack of a foreskin in the male partner produces symptoms similar to those of female arousal disorder.{{Verify source|date=2008-10}} The authors hypothesized that the gliding action possibly involved intercourse with an uncircumcised partner might help prevent the loss of vaginal lubrication.{{Verify source|date=2008-10}} They stated that the respondents were self-selected, and that larger sample sizes are needed.<ref name="boyle2002" /> | |||
A study by psychologists Bensley & Boyle (2003) reported that vaginal dryness can be a problem when the male partner is circumcised.<ref>{{REFjournal | A study by psychologists Bensley & Boyle (2003) reported that vaginal dryness can be a problem when the male partner is circumcised.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
| Line 717: | Line 719: | ||
|date=2003-09 | |date=2003-09 | ||
|accessdate=2020-04-27 | |accessdate=2020-04-27 | ||
}}</ref | }}</ref> | ||
==Effect of circumcision on heterosexual relations== | ==Effect of circumcision on heterosexual relations== | ||