Circumcision advocate: Difference between revisions

Line 11:

== Bullying techniques ==

Chances are that discussions about the [[MGM]] topic culminate in an exchange of unkindness. There is no tendency to determine whether [[intactivist]]s or circumcision ~~advocats~~ have started to escalate a discussion; people and situations are too different for that and each person has other trigger words to react on. But there are samples which often repeat and are used by circumcision ~~advocats~~ mostly, especially when they can no longer stand up argumentatively.

Chances are that discussions about the [[MGM]] topic will culminate in an exchange of unkindness. There is no tendency to determine whether [[intactivist]]s or circumcision advocates have started to escalate a discussion; people and situations are too different for that and each person has other trigger words on which to react. But there are samples which often repeat and are used by circumcision advocates mostly, especially when they can no longer stand up argumentatively.

* Accuse the opponent as being anti-Semitic.

Line 18:

* Cite [[arguments pro circumcision]] that have long since been refuted.

* Claim that inactivists are not about children's rights.

* Claim that intactivists are ~~pedophile~~.

* Claim that intactivists are pedophiles.

* Denounce inactivists to their employer/organization/party as anti-Semites, etc.

* Deny and make fun of personal experiences and sufferings from mutilated men.

* Distract from the topic.

* Focus on the child's penis, not on his human rights.

* Focus on the child's penis, not on his [[human rights]].

* Give names.

* Insist on [[arguments pro circumcision|circumcision myths]] which are already debunked by science or ~~testemonies~~.

* Insist on [[arguments pro circumcision|circumcision myths]] which are already debunked by science or testimonies.

* ~~Name~~ intactivism a "cult".

* Call intactivism a "cult".

* Ridicule all arguments of the opponent, without counter arguments.

* Send death threats.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 == Bullying techniques ==
-Chances are that discussions about the [[MGM]] topic culminate in an exchange of unkindness. There is no tendency to determine whether [[intactivist]]s or circumcision advocats have started to escalate a discussion; people and situations are too different for that and each person has other trigger words to react on. But there are samples which often repeat and are used by circumcision advocats mostly, especially when they can no longer stand up argumentatively.
+Chances are that discussions about the [[MGM]] topic will culminate in an exchange of unkindness. There is no tendency to determine whether [[intactivist]]s or circumcision advocates have started to escalate a discussion; people and situations are too different for that and each person has other trigger words on which to react. But there are samples which often repeat and are used by circumcision advocates mostly, especially when they can no longer stand up argumentatively.
 {{Incomplete}}
 * Accuse the opponent as being anti-Semitic.
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 * Cite [[arguments pro circumcision]] that have long since been refuted.
 * Claim that inactivists are not about children's rights.
-* Claim that intactivists are pedophile.
+* Claim that intactivists are pedophiles.
 * Denounce inactivists to their employer/organization/party as anti-Semites, etc.
 * Deny and make fun of personal experiences and sufferings from mutilated men.
 * Distract from the topic.
-* Focus on the child's penis, not on his human rights.
+* Focus on the child's penis, not on his [[human rights]].
 * Give names.
-* Insist on [[arguments pro circumcision|circumcision myths]] which are already debunked by science or testemonies.
+* Insist on [[arguments pro circumcision|circumcision myths]] which are already debunked by science or testimonies.
-* Name intactivism a "cult".
+* Call intactivism a "cult".
 * Ridicule all arguments of the opponent, without counter arguments.
 * Send death threats.