Difference between revisions of "The Psychology of Circumcision Communication & Social Change"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (using Template:PhD)
m (using ABBR section; faded REF)
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
* [https://twitter.com/circresource Twitter page]
 
* [https://twitter.com/circresource Twitter page]
  
{{REF}}
+
{{ABBR}}<!--{{REF}}-->
  
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Psychology of Circumcision Communication}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Psychology of Circumcision Communication}}

Latest revision as of 15:05, 13 October 2021

Psychologist Ronald Goldman, Ph.D.[a 1], author of "Questioning Circumcision: A Jewish Perspective" and "Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma" discusses strategies for effective communication about ending circumcision.

Communication about circumcision may be improved by considering psychological factors such as empathy and persuasiveness. A preliminary persuasiveness survey identified statements that most influenced subjects to question the advisability of circumcision. The right to physical integrity ranked lower in persuasiveness than several statements about harm. Arguments critical of circumcision may contribute to a law prohibiting it, but such a law alone is not likely to change attitudes about the practice in religious groups. Additional steps are recommended to reduce distrust and opposition, start removing the barriers that restrict helpful dialogue, and create a bridge. Changing circumcision practice will require broad-based, long-term commitment. Choosing new approaches and programs that minimize disruption and fit the reality of the situation would facilitate progress. Psychological sensitivity is essential for improving communication and contributing to personal and social change.

External links

Abbreviations

  1. REFweb Doctor of Philosophy, Wikipedia. Retrieved 16 June 2021. (Also abbreviated as D.Phil.)