17,092
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Medical science: Add text and citation.
|pages=134-7
|accessdate=2024-07-05
}}</ref>
* Parkash et al. (1982) studied the source of the wetness that is characteristic of the [[preputial sac]]. They determined that the wetness did not come from urine. They said:
<blockquote>
As such it appears safe to conclude that the space is kept moist and also clean in those with preputial stenosis, by the secretions of the prostate, supplemented by the seminal secretion of the mucin content of the secretion of the urethral glands.<ref name="parkash1982A">{{REFjournal
|last=Parkash
|first=
|init=S
|author-link=
|last2=Rao
|first2=
|init2=R
|author2-link=
|last3=Venkatesan
|first3=
|init3=K
|author3-link=
|last4=Ramakrishnan
|first4=
|init4=S
|author4-link=
|etal=no
|title=Sub-preputial wetness - Its nature.
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Ann Nat Med Sci (India
|location=
|date=1982
|volume=18
|issue=3
|pages=109-12
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/prakash/
|archived=
|quote=As such it appears safe to conclude that the space is kept moist and also clean in those with preputial stenosis, by the secretions of the prostate, supplemented by the seminal secretion of the mucin content of the secretion of the urethral glands
|pubmedID=
|pubmedCID=
|accessdate=2024-07-05
}}</ref>
</blockquote>
* Parkash (1982) argued against non-therapeutic (routine) circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=
|first=
|init=
|author-link=
|etal=no
|title=Is routine circumcision necessary?
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal= J Indian Med Assoc
|location=
|date=1982-05
|volume=78
|issue=(9-10)
|article=
|page=
|pages=150-1
|url=
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=7130729
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=
|doi=
|accessdate=2024-07-09
}}</ref>
{{LINKS}}