India: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Religious matters: Revise text. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Medical science: Add text. |
||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
|trans-title= | |trans-title= | ||
|language= | |language= | ||
|journal= J Indian Med Assoc | |journal=J Indian Med Assoc | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
|date=1982-05 | |date=1982-05 | ||
| Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
|accessdate=2024-07-09 | |accessdate=2024-07-09 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
* Agarwal et al. (2005) studied preputial retraction in Indian boys. <ref name="agarwal2005">{{REFjournal | * Agarwal et al. (2005) studied preputial retraction in Indian boys.<ref name="agarwal2005">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Agarwal | |last=Agarwal | ||
|first= | |first= | ||
| Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
|accessdate=2024-07-05 | |accessdate=2024-07-05 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
* Shahid (2012) <ref name="shahid2012">{{REFjournal | * Shahid (2012) emphasized the necessity of properly diagnosing the type of phimosis when a boy with a non-retractable [[foreskin]] is presented. He also stated that [[circumcision]] is becoming outmoded as a treatment for phimosis.<ref name="shahid2012">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Shahid | |last=Shahid | ||
|first= | |first= | ||