Ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision: Difference between revisions

m Wikify Peter W. Adler.
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m adjusted REFbook parameters
Line 24: Line 24:
  |issue=
  |issue=
  |pages=301–310
  |pages=301–310
}}</ref> <ref name="RACPSumm">{{REFweb
}}</ref><ref name="RACPSumm">{{REFweb
  |url=http://www.racp.edu.au/download.cfm?DownloadFile=A453CFA1-2A57-5487-DF36DF59A1BAF527
  |url=http://www.racp.edu.au/download.cfm?DownloadFile=A453CFA1-2A57-5487-DF36DF59A1BAF527
  |title=Policy Statement On Circumcision
  |title=Policy Statement On Circumcision
Line 34: Line 34:
  |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080720092409/http://www.racp.edu.au/download.cfm?DownloadFile=A453CFA1-2A57-5487-DF36DF59A1BAF527
  |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080720092409/http://www.racp.edu.au/download.cfm?DownloadFile=A453CFA1-2A57-5487-DF36DF59A1BAF527
  |archivedate=2008-07-20
  |archivedate=2008-07-20
}}</ref> <ref name="bma2006">Committee on Medical Ethics. [https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/children-and-young-people/non-therapeutic-male-circumcision-of-children-ethics-toolkit The law and ethics of male circumcision: Guidance for doctors]. London: British Medical Association 2006.</ref>
}}</ref><ref name="bma2006">Committee on Medical Ethics. [https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/children-and-young-people/non-therapeutic-male-circumcision-of-children-ethics-toolkit The law and ethics of male circumcision: Guidance for doctors]. London: British Medical Association 2006.</ref>


Some medical associations take the position that the parents should determine what is in the best interest of the infant or child.<ref name="AAP1999">{{REFjournal
Some medical associations take the position that the parents should determine what is in the best interest of the infant or child.<ref name="AAP1999">{{REFjournal
Line 553: Line 553:
{{Main|Circumcision and HIV}}
{{Main|Circumcision and HIV}}


Rennie ''et al''. (2007) remark that the results of three randomised controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa, showing reduced risk of HIV among circumcised men, "alter the terms of the debate over the ethics of male circumcision."<ref name="rennie2007">{{REFjournal
Rennie ''et al.'' (2007) remark that the results of three randomised controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa, showing reduced risk of HIV among circumcised men, "alter the terms of the debate over the ethics of male circumcision."<ref name="rennie2007">{{REFjournal
  |last=Rennie
  |last=Rennie
  |first=Stuart
  |first=Stuart
Line 576: Line 576:
  |last=Boyle
  |last=Boyle
  |first=G.J.
  |first=G.J.
|author-link=Gregory Boyle
  |year=2013
  |year=2013
  |chapter=Critique of African RCTs into Male Circumcision and HIV Sexual Transmission.
  |chapter=Critique of African RCTs into Male Circumcision and HIV Sexual Transmission.
  |editor=G.C. Denniston ''et al.''
  |editors=[[George C. Denniston]], [[Frederick M. Hodges]], [[Marilyn Fayre Milos]]
  |title=Genital Cutting: Protecting Children from Medical, Cultural, and Religious Infringements
  |title=Genital Cutting: Protecting Children from Medical, Cultural, and Religious Infringements
  |location=Dordrecht, The Netherlands
  |location=Dordrecht, The Netherlands