George Hill
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
George Hill is the Vice-President for Medical Science and Bioethics of Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.), and its prolific scribe. George joined DOC in 1997 and swiftly became a highly productive advocate. He has to his credit several published articles and letter-briefs questioning circumcision. He has kept up a lively correspondence with the American Academy of Pediatrics, the CDC, and state Medicaid agencies nationwide. He was the author of the original Doctors Opposing Circumcision Genital Integrity Policy Statement,[1] the framework for the new D.O.C. website.[2]
Publications
- Hill G. Can anyone authorize the nontherapeutic permanent alteration of a child's body?. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2003; 3(2) PMID. DOI. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- Hill, George (29 August 2004).
The Holy Bible, circumcision, false prophets, and Christian parents
, CIRP. Retrieved 28 September 2019. - Hill G, Geisheker JV. Edgar Schoen does not represent the North American view of male circumcision. Arch Dis Child. January 2006; 91(1): 92. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
- Hill G. The case against circumcision. Journal of Men's Health and Gender. 2007; 4(3): 318-323. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
- Denniston GC, Hill G. Gairdner was wrong. Can Fam Physician. October 2010; 56(10): 986-7. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 28 September 2019.
- Hill, George (27 May 2012).
Circumcision and human behavior: The emotional and behavioral effects of circumcision.
, Wordpress. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
Standard work
- Boyle GJ, Hill G. Sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: Methodological, ethical and legal concerns . Thompson Reuter. December 2011; 19(2): 316-34. PMID. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
References
- ↑ Hill, George: Genital Integrity Policy Statement , Doctors Opposing Circumcision. (2008). Retrieved 19 September 2019.
- ↑ (2019).
Board of Directors and Advisors
, Doctors Opposing Circumcision. Retrieved 18 September 2019.