Danish open letter to Danish Agency for Patient Safety

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Morten Frisch and 41 of his colleagues (chief physicians, specialists, ward doctors and junior doctors) protested in an open letter[1] against the knee-jerk reaction to religious pressure that the Danish Agency for Patient Safety has shown in the issue of the boy circumcision problem.

This is the original text of the open letter which was published on politiken.dk on 21 September 2020 [Google auto-translated]:

Jewish law should not dictate the rules for boy circumcision in Denmark

As doctors, we see with the greatest concern the kneeling to religious pressure in the case of circumcision of boys.

If the politicians at Christiansborg decide that healthy boys must continue to be able to be circumcised before they come of age, which we as doctors strongly advise against, then the minimum requirement must be to ensure the boys competent surgery and pain relief during the operation. It can only be achieved by having trained surgeons perform the procedure and postpone it until after the age of 2, where it can take place under full anesthesia, as recommended by the country's surgeons and anaesthesiologists.

However, the Jewish community is not to be slammed or stabbed when it comes to ensuring medically sound surgery and pain relief. It shows recently published minutes from meetings between the Jewish Community and the Danish Agency for Patient Safety on the boy circumcision problem.

In Jewish boy circumcisions in Denmark, the operation is performed by a religious circumciser who is not a doctor, and only Emla (popularly called magic cream) is used, which provides insufficient, superficial pain relief. Emla is the least effective form of local anesthetic; the pain relief is significantly worse than with local anesthesia with injection of anesthetic at the root of the penis and significantly less than that obtained with full anesthesia. In addition, Emla is not at all approved by the Danish Medicines Agency for use on the genitals of children under 12 years of age.

For ritual circumcisions performed by doctors in private surgical clinics, local anesthesia with injection of anesthetic at the root of the penis and possibly prior Emla is used. It gives the boys significantly better pain relief than at the ritual Jewish circumcisions. Unfortunately, this type of local anesthesia fails in up to every 10-20. cases and therefore does not ensure all boys pain relief. The boys also risk circulatory problems and possibly cardiac arrest if the anesthetic is accidentally injected directly into the bloodstream or into the swelling bodies of the penis.

From the minutes of the meetings between the Jewish Community and the Danish Agency for Patient Safety, it appears that the former "has significant reservations" about local anesthesia with injection of anesthetic at the root of the penis, and that a requirement for full anesthesia would be contrary to "Jewish law".

According to the Jewish Community, it would also constitute a "technical ban on circumcision" if the procedure was required to be performed by a competent surgeon. The Jewish Society thus insists that Danish Jews must be able to continue as before with a religious non-doctor as operator and with the use of the slightest form of local anesthetic, i.e. magic cream on the urinal and a little grape juice on a pacifier to confuse the boy.

The situation is now that all the invited medical companies have emigrated in protest from the working group under the Danish Agency for Patient Safety, which is to prepare a new clinical guide on non-therapeutic boy circumcision. The reason is that the Danish Agency for Patient Safety has not listened to and taken the medical recommendations seriously. On the other hand, it is safe to say that it has listened extremely attentively to the Jewish community, indeed, it has listened to such an extent that the Jewish community has in fact - with reference to 'Jewish law' - made the board deny the medical professionals companies' key recommendations.

According to the Danish Agency for Patient Safety, approximately 2,000 non-therapeutic boy circumcisions take place each year, which is a low estimate, as this does not include the circumcision of sons of descendants from Muslim countries. The real number of boy circumcisions in Denmark can therefore very well be over 3,000 a year.

Of these, Jewish boy circumcisions performed by the ritual circumcision account for in the order of 5-10 per year, corresponding to 0.2-0.5 percent of all boy circumcisions in Denmark.

When the Jewish Society turns its back on the Danish Agency for Patient Safety and trumps the demand to be able to continue with the same medically indefensible circumcision practice as before, it will not only make the beginning of life painful for the 5-10 boys with Jewish parents who leave them circumcised ritually. With the agency's compliance with 'Jewish law', the Jewish community effectively prevents all the 2,000-3,000 other boys from predominantly Muslim families from being effectively relieved of their pain.

As physicians, we look with the greatest concern at the kneeling to religious pressure, at the denial of the expertise of medical societies, and at the failure of the weak in this game, namely, the boys. Not least the thousands of boys with Muslim family backgrounds who, due to the veto of religious Jews, will be denied access to effective pain relief.

When Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen claims to want to fight anti-Semitism in Denmark, it does not benefit the case that she and her government almost equate circumcision resistance and anti-Semitism, let a painful and destructive ritual like boy circumcision continue at the request of religious Danish Jews and at the same time let consideration to 'Jewish law' make it impossible to ensure proper surgery and optimal pain relief for the - predominantly Muslim - boys, who in future come under the knife, as long as the ritual is legal in Denmark.


  • Morten Frisch, overlæge, dr.med., Ph.D.[2], adj. professor
  • Arash Afshari, overlæge, Ph.D.[2] (børneanæstesiologi og intensiv medicin)
  • Kasper Linde Ankjærgaard, læge, Ph.D.[2]
  • Lisbeth Asserhøj, speciallæge (almen medicin)
  • Niels Bentzon, overlæge (kirurgi)
  • Eva Christensen, speciallæge (almen medicin)
  • Lise Darling, speciallæge (pædiatri)
  • Sven Felsby, overlæge (anæstesiologi og intensiv medicin)
  • Sarah Grunnet, afdelingslæge (pædiatri)
  • Jamal Abed Hanash, overlæge, Ph.D.[2] (kardiologi)
  • Joachim Hoffmann-Petersen, overlæge (anæstesiologi og intensiv medicin)
  • Morten Holm, speciallæge (almen medicin)
  • Jens Hornshøj, speciallæge (almen medicin)
  • Benedikte Kolbæk Jacobsen, speciallæge (almen medicin)
  • Simon Vedel Juel Jensen, læge
  • Peter Jensen-Gadegaard, overlæge (anæstesiologi og intensiv medicin)
  • Katrine Staudt Jeppesen, speciallæge (pædiatri)
  • Trine Maria Mejnert Jørgensen, afdelingslæge, Ph.D.[2] (karkirurgi)
  • Anas Al Kahwa, læge
  • Preben Kirkegaard, professor emeritus, dr.med. (kirurgi)
  • Jens Stubager Knudsen, overlæge (anæstesiologi og intensiv medicin)
  • Søren Mehl Knudsen, læge
  • Larry Højgaard Kristiansen, speciallæge (oto-rhino-laryngologi)
  • Stine Kähler, overlæge (børneanæstesiologi og intensiv medicin)
  • Thomas Lafrenz, overlæge (anæstesiologi og intensiv medicin)
  • Andy Kleis Larfred, overlæge (ortopædkirurgi)
  • Hans Kristian Lauritsen, speciallæge (anæstesiologi og intensiv medicin)
  • Martin Louring-Andersen, overlæge (kirurgi)
  • Sveinar Menne, overlæge (urologi)
  • Hamoun Ashournia Nissen, læge
  • Juri Lindy Pedersen, overlæge, dr.med. (pædiatri)
  • Hadi Riazi, overlæge (karkirurgi)
  • Frederik Schaltz-Buchholzer, læge, Ph.D.[2]
  • Anne Mette Skjødt-Jensen, overlæge (anæstesiologi og intensiv medicin)
  • Anders Peter Gerholt Skovsen, afdelingslæge (kirurgi)
  • Peter Olsen Svenningsen, overlæge (kirurgi)
  • Katrine Søe, overlæge (kirurgi)
  • Morten Søe, overlæge (neurokirurgi)
  • Line Lahn Sørensen, læge
  • Niels Henrik Valerius, fhv. overlæge, lektor, dr.med. (pædiatri)
  • Søren Venø, afdelingslæge (anæstesiologi og intensiv medicin)
  • Susanne Wammen, overlæge (anæstesiologi og intensiv medicin)

See also

External links

Links to minutes of meetings between the Jewish Community and the Danish Agency for Patient Safety:


  1. REFweb (21 September 2020). Opråb fra bekymrede læger: Jødisk lov skal ikke diktere reglerne for drengeomskæring i Danmark [Calls from concerned doctors: Jewish law should not dictate the rules for boy circumcision in Denmark] (Danish), Politiken.dk. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
  2. a b c d e f Abbreviation: REFweb Doctor of Philosophy, Wikipedia. Retrieved 16 June 2021.