20,855
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Add external link.
How does surgical alteration of the [[penis]] in infancy ([[circumcision]]) affect the sexuality of a man when he becomes an adult?
How does the [[circumcised]] [[penis ]] affect the sexual pleasure of the woman on the receiving end? And
How does sexual pleasure during intercourse—or a deficiency—affect the love bond of the relationship?
Presents unequivocal evidence that the [[foreskin]] plays a multifaceted role during intercourse that not only promotes increased sexual pleasure, but this enhanced pleasure also serves to enrich and continually re-cement the love bond, borne from sexual union.
Circumcision's removal of the [[foreskin]] (ultra-erogenous tissue and the [[penis]]'s only moving part) not only diminishes the man's sexual pleasure, but also the woman's.
A national survey of women, conducted by the author, reveals that [[circumcision]] abnormalizes the way the [[penis]] thrusts and feels to a woman, significantly diminishing her sexual enjoyment and her ability to achieve orgasm from intercourse.
The book's explanations of the profound negative effects [[circumcision]] has on the intercourse experience of both partners will surely leave [[United States| America]] stunned. But luckily, there is a bright side to this shocking news: It is now possible to restore the [[foreskin ]] through various non-surgical techniques. The book addresses this topic and enwraps the emerging movement for [[foreskin restoration]] with hope, promise, and dignity.
== Critics ==
The [[circumcision advocate]] website [[Andrew Gross#Circumcision Choice|Circumcision Choice]] debunked challenged the flaws and bias of O'Hara's study which is the basis of this book. While most some of the counter-arguments by [[Andrew Gross#Circumcision Choice|Circumcision Choice]] seem to be valid, the refutation itself also uses wordings which expose the [[Bias| biased view]] pro -circumcision of the ostensibly anonymous author of the refutation which seems to be [[Andrew Gross]].<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/ohara
|title=Sex as the researcher intended it
|accessdate=2021-06-08
}}</ref>
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Vagina]]
{{LINKS}}
* [http://www.amazon.com/Sex-As-Nature-Intended-Important-ebook/dp/B004UH1RDS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1436756242&sr=8-1&keywords=sex+as+nature+intended+it Sex as nature intended it - Kindle]
* [http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/ Author's website] - You can read the book for free on their website
* {{REFjournal |last=O'Hara |first=Kristen |init=K |author-link=Kristen O'Hara |last2=O'Hara |first2=Jeffrey |init2=J |author2-link=Jeffrey O'Hara |etal=no |title=The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner |trans-title= |language= |journal=BJU Int |location= |date=1999-01-01 |volume=83 Suppl 1 |issue= |article= |page= |pages=79-84 |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ |archived= |quote= |pubmedID= 10349418 |pubmedCID= |DOI=10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1079.x |accessdate=2023-01-06}}* {{REFnews |title=A Cut Below |url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2007/2007-07-15_SFChronicle.php |last=Guthmann |first=Edward |init= |author-link= |publisher=San Francisco Chronicle |website= |date=2007-07-15 |accessdate=2024-07-28 |quote=People are vociferous on the [[foreskin]] question, none more than Kristen O'Hara, the author of "Sex as Nature Intended It" (2002), in which she claims women are more likely to enjoy intercourse if their male partner is uncircumcised.}}
{{REF}}
[[Category:Education]]
[[Category:Female sexuality]]
[[Category:Male sexuality]]
[[Category:Intactivist literature]]
[[Category:Literature]]
[[Category:USA]]
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]