Intact Global: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
==Video== | ==Video== | ||
Intact Global maintains a [https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=intact%20global channel] at YouTube. | |||
===Intact Global Launch - Collaboration with GALDEF and LIVE Viewer Q&A!=== | ===Intact Global Launch - Collaboration with GALDEF and LIVE Viewer Q&A!=== | ||
<youtube>v=gujPtfh1Y0g&t=12s</youtube> | <youtube>v=gujPtfh1Y0g&t=12s</youtube> | ||
| Line 91: | Line 93: | ||
===A Landmark Case for Children’s Rights: Intact Global’s SECOND Constitutional Challenge=== | ===A Landmark Case for Children’s Rights: Intact Global’s SECOND Constitutional Challenge=== | ||
<youtube>v=oPka-aU3O1Q</youtube> | <youtube>v=oPka-aU3O1Q</youtube> | ||
===Intact Global 2026 Conference Livestream – Day 1=== | |||
<youtube>?v=otFj_dNVLD0</youtube> | |||
===Intact Global 2026 Conference Livestream – Day 2=== | |||
<youtube>v=I3iEeuJseLE</youtube> | |||
==News on Intact Global lawsuit== | ==News on Intact Global Oregon lawsuit== | ||
The counsel for the Defendant had filed a petition to dismiss the Intact Global lawsuit. A hearing was held in Portland before Judge Melvin Oden-Orr on 23 October 2025. The Court rejected the claims of the Defendant and dismissed the petition. Apparently the way is now clear to adjudicate the case on its merits. | The counsel for the Defendant had filed a petition to dismiss the Intact Global lawsuit. A hearing was held in Portland before Judge Melvin Oden-Orr on 23 October 2025. The Court rejected the claims of the Defendant and dismissed the petition. Apparently the way is now clear to adjudicate the case on its merits. | ||
| Line 106: | Line 112: | ||
|accessdate=2026-02-13 | |accessdate=2026-02-13 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Intact Global has announced that discovery is complete. | |||
<HR> | <HR> | ||
| Line 111: | Line 119: | ||
===Courageous Conversations: The Fight Against Newborn Genital Mutilation=== | ===Courageous Conversations: The Fight Against Newborn Genital Mutilation=== | ||
<youtube>v=mZpzr-351M4</youtube> | <youtube>v=mZpzr-351M4</youtube> | ||
===Is circumcision child abuse? Attorney Eric Clopper meets TheTinMen=== | |||
<youtube>v=-BSsvUdAPR4</youtube> | |||
==Intact Global conference in Los Angeles in April 2026== | ==Intact Global conference in Los Angeles in April 2026== | ||
| Line 118: | Line 129: | ||
Tickets are required. | Tickets are required. | ||
==Intact Global names Colorado as a target== | |||
Intact Global has selected Colorado as the next state to be sued regarding equal protection. There will be an [https://www.reddit.com/r/IntactGlobal/comments/1ttk657/colorado_were_coming/#lightbox Colorado Launch Dinner announcement] on Monday, 14 December 2026. | |||
The Launch Dinner will be held in the [https://wrightroom.co/ Wright Room] of the [https://appaloosagrill.com/ Appaloosa Grill]. | |||
The Bill of Rights of Colorado is found in Article II of the Constitution of 1876.<ref>{{REFdocument | |||
|title=Constitution of the State of Colorado | |||
|url=https://content.leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/images/olls/crs2024-title-00.pdf | |||
|contribution= | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|publisher=State of Colorado | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|date=1876 | |||
|accessdate=2026-06-07 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
The Attorney-General of Colorado is [https://coag.gov/ Phil Weiser], who would be in charge of the representation of Colorado in the court. | |||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| Line 259: | Line 290: | ||
|date=2025-07-25 | |date=2025-07-25 | ||
|accessdate=2025-10-18 | |accessdate=2025-10-18 | ||
}} | |||
* {{REFnews | |||
|title=U.S. Circumcision Lawsuit Advances as Doctors Behind Policy Backtrack | |||
|url=https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/u-s-circumcision-lawsuit-advances-as-doctors-behind-policy-backtrack/ | |||
|last=Wald | |||
|first=Rebecca | |||
|author-link=Rebecca Wald | |||
|publisher=The Times of Israel | |||
|date=2025-10-28 | |||
|accessdate=2026-04-30 | |||
|quote=At issue is whether gender-specific protections against genital cutting can withstand constitutional scrutiny in an era of increasing legal and ethical focus on bodily autonomy. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||