Australia: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add foreskin revolution to SEEALSO section. |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 220: | Line 220: | ||
|last=Turner | |last=Turner | ||
|first=Neville | |first=Neville | ||
|author-link= | |author-link=J. Neville Turner | ||
|title=Circumcised boys may sue | |title=Circumcised boys may sue | ||
|journal=The Health Law Update (Australia) | |journal=The Health Law Update (Australia) | ||
| Line 231: | Line 231: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Boyle ''et al'' | Boyle ''et al.'' (2000) suggested that non-therapeutic circumcision of boys is "criminal assault." They concluded: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Enforced non-therapeutic genital cutting of unconsenting minors is overdue for recognition by the legal community as sexual mutilation. As we enter the 21st Century, appropriate legal action must be taken to safeguard the physical genital integrity of male children.<ref>{{REFjournal | Enforced non-therapeutic genital cutting of unconsenting minors is overdue for recognition by the legal community as sexual mutilation. As we enter the 21st Century, appropriate legal action must be taken to safeguard the physical genital integrity of male children.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
| Line 245: | Line 245: | ||
|last4=Turner | |last4=Turner | ||
|first4=Neville | |first4=Neville | ||
|author4-link= | |author4-link=J. Neville Turner | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Circumcision of Healthy Boys: Criminal Assault? | |title=Circumcision of Healthy Boys: Criminal Assault? | ||