Australia: Difference between revisions

Line 24:

The incidence of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision in Australia approached that of the United States in the 1930s through 1960s.

[[Douglas Gairdner]]'s famous, classic 1949 paper, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision'',<ref name="gairdner1949">{{~~REFjournal~~

[[Douglas Gairdner]]'s famous, classic 1949 paper, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision'',<ref name="gairdner1949">{{:GairdnerDM1949}}</ref> seems to have had no effect in Australia. However, criticism of the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision accelerated in 1967.

~~|last=Gairdner~~

~~|first=Douglas M.~~

~~|init=DM~~

~~|title=The fate of the foreskin~~: ~~a study of circumcision~~

~~|journal=British Medical Journal~~

~~|volume=2~~

~~|issue=4642~~

~~|pages=1433-1437~~

~~|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2051968/pdf/brmedj03656-0009.pdf~~

~~|quote=~~

~~|pubmedID=15408299~~

~~|pubmedCID=2051968~~

~~|DOI=10.1136/bmj.2.4642.1433~~

~~|date=1949~~

~~|accessdate=2019-10-28~~

}}</ref> seems to have had no effect in Australia. However, criticism of the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision accelerated in 1967.

Morgan (1967) criticised non-therapeutic circumcision in a letter published in the ''Medical Journal of Australia''.<ref>{{REFjournal

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 The incidence of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision in Australia approached that of the United States in the 1930s through 1960s.
-[[Douglas Gairdner]]'s famous, classic 1949 paper, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision'',<ref name="gairdner1949">{{REFjournal
+[[Douglas Gairdner]]'s famous, classic 1949 paper, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision'',<ref name="gairdner1949">{{:GairdnerDM1949}}</ref> seems to have had no effect in Australia. However, criticism of the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision accelerated in 1967.
- |last=Gairdner
- |first=Douglas M.
- |init=DM
- |title=The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision
- |journal=British Medical Journal
- |volume=2
- |issue=4642
- |pages=1433-1437
- |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2051968/pdf/brmedj03656-0009.pdf
- |quote=
- |pubmedID=15408299
- |pubmedCID=2051968
- |DOI=10.1136/bmj.2.4642.1433
- |date=1949
- |accessdate=2019-10-28
-}}</ref> seems to have had no effect in Australia. However, criticism of the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision accelerated in 1967.
 Morgan (1967) criticised non-therapeutic circumcision in a letter published in the ''Medical Journal of Australia''.<ref>{{REFjournal