Abraham L. Wolbarst: Difference between revisions
m using ABBR section |
m wikify Robert S. Van Howe |
||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
}}</ref> No statistics exist to document how many men were circumcised because of Wolbarst's article. | }}</ref> No statistics exist to document how many men were circumcised because of Wolbarst's article. | ||
The adoption of circumcision as a prophylactic amputation by American military services falsely stigmatized the [[foreskin]] as being unhealthy. Van Howe (1999) has exhaustively shown that circumcision does not protect against STDs.<ref name="vanhowe1999">{{REFjournal | The adoption of circumcision as a prophylactic amputation by American military services falsely stigmatized the [[foreskin]] as being unhealthy. [[Robert S. Van Howe|Van Howe]] (1999) has exhaustively shown that circumcision does not protect against STDs.<ref name="vanhowe1999">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Van Howe | |last=Van Howe | ||
|first=Robert S. | |first=Robert S. | ||
|init=RS | |init=RS | ||
|author-link=Robert Van Howe | |author-link=Robert S. Van Howe | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Does circumcision influence sexually transmitted diseases?: A literature review | |title=Does circumcision influence sexually transmitted diseases?: A literature review | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
|date=1999 | |date=1999 | ||
|volume=83 | |volume=83 | ||
|issue= | |issue=Suppl. 1 | ||
|pages=52-62 | |pages=52-62 | ||
|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1052.x | |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1052.x | ||