India: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 204: | Line 204: | ||
|accessdate=2024-07-05 | |accessdate=2024-07-05 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
* Shahid (2012) emphasized the necessity of properly diagnosing the type of phimosis when a boy with a non-retractable [[foreskin]] is presented. He also stated that [[circumcision]] is becoming outmoded as a treatment for phimosis.<ref name="shahid2012">{{REFjournal | * Shahid (2012) emphasized the necessity of properly diagnosing the type of [[phimosis]] when a boy with a non-retractable [[foreskin]] is presented. He also stated that [[circumcision]] is becoming outmoded as a treatment for phimosis.<ref name="shahid2012">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Shahid | |last=Shahid | ||
|first= | |first= | ||
| Line 230: | Line 230: | ||
|accessdate=2025-07-05 | |accessdate=2025-07-05 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
* Manekar et al. (2022) surveyed | * Manekar et al. (2022) surveyed paediatricians across India and found that most were so poorly trained that they could not distinguish between normal physiological phimosis and pathological phimosis in boys, which may result in large numbers of unnecessary circumcisions of boys.<ref name="manetar2022">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Manetar | |last=Manetar | ||
|first= | |first= | ||