Difference between revisions of "Medical trade association"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add text and citation.)
(Legal issue: Add link in SEEALSO section.)
Line 96: Line 96:
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
* [[Circumcision study flaws]]
 
* [[Circumcision study flaws]]
 +
* [[Circumcision Is A Fraud: And The Coming Legal Reckoning]]
 
* [[State medical societies and associations]]
 
* [[State medical societies and associations]]
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}

Revision as of 17:00, 10 December 2024

A medical trade association is an organization composed of health care professionals who have united to advance their common professional trade, business, financial, and legal interests.[1] Such organizations serve as labor unions for health care professionals.

General medical associations

Some are broadly based national medical trade associations which accept membership of every type of physician. Some examples are:

and many others.

The medical trade associations have their own association:

Specialist medical trade associations

There are also many medical trade associations to advance the particular professional trade, business, financial, and legal interests of medical specialists. Some examples are:

and many others.

Medical trade association statements regarding medical care

Medical trade associations occasionally issue an opinion statement regarding medical care offered by their speciality. The public should be aware that the medical trade associations first duty is to protect and improve the income stream of its membership. This frequently creates a conflict of interest between the best interests of the patient and the best interests of the member doctors.

Such statements may exhibit considerable bias toward protection of physician income.[1]

Statements regarding male circumcision

Some medical trade associations have published an advisory statement regarding male circumcision. Male circumcision invariably causes psychic and physical trauma and loss of various physiological functions. When performed on an newborn infant who cannot safely be given general anesthesia, circumcision causes extreme, traumatizing pain. For good reason, the statements appear to have been vetted by their legal departments.

Typically, the statements may:

Statements that follow this formula offers advantages to a medical trade association:

  • The absence of a recommendation for circumcision allows the association to escape claims for damages.
  • The absence of a condemnation of circumcision allows individual members to continue to profit from performing circumcisions.

Please see Position statements on infant circumcision for a discussion of individual statements.

Legal issue

Full disclosure of the pain, physical and psychic trauma, and loss of physiological function caused by harmful circumcision would expose fellows/members to lawsuits for damages so statements refrain from full disclosure of the harm and certain injury.[2]

See also

References

  1. a b REFjournal Hill G. The case against circumcision PDF. Journal of Men's Health and Gender. 2007; 4(3): 318-323. Retrieved 1 October 2023.
  2. REFjournal Adler PW. Is circumcision legal? PDF. Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest. 2013; 16(3): 439-86. Retrieved 10 December 2024.