Marilyn Fayre Milos: Difference between revisions

m Support for genital autonomy: Fix inoperative link.
Line 15: Line 15:


<blockquote>
<blockquote>
''Only by denying the existence of excruciating pain, perinatal encoding of the brain with violence, interruption of maternal-infant bonding, betrayal of infant trust, the risks and effects of permanently altering normal genitalia, the right of human beings to sexually intact and functional bodies, and the right to individual religious freedoms can human beings continue this practice.''<ref>Marilyn Fayre Milos, Donna Macris, "[http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/milos-macris/| Circumcision: A Medical or a Human Rights Issue?]" ''Journal of Nurse-Midwifery'', vol. 37 (1992), no. 2, sup. 1, pp. S87-S96.</ref>
''Only by denying the existence of excruciating pain, perinatal encoding of the brain with violence, interruption of maternal-infant bonding, betrayal of infant trust, the risks and effects of permanently altering normal genitalia, the right of human beings to sexually intact and functional bodies, and the right to individual religious freedoms can human beings continue this practice.''<ref>Marilyn Fayre Milos, Donna Macris, "[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/009121829290012R| Circumcision: A Medical or a Human Rights Issue?]" ''Journal of Nurse-Midwifery'', vol. 37 (1992), no. 2, sup. 1, pp. S87-S96.</ref>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>