Flesh and Blood
| Title | Flesh and Blood |
| Subtitle | Perspectives on the Problem of Circumcision in Contemporary Society |
| Author | Denniston, George C., Hodges, Frederick Mansfield, Milos, Marilyn Fayre (Eds.) |
| Pages | XVI, 254 |
| Format | |
| Edition | 1 |
| First Edition | 2004 |
| Publisher | Springer US |
| ISBN | 978-1-4419-3446-8 |
Flesh and Blood: Perspectives on the Problem of Circumcision in Contemporary Society is a compilation of the proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Human Rights and Modern Society which convened in the Georgetown University Conference Center in Washington, DC, USA on 4-7 April 2002.
Contents
About this book
Who owns your sex organs? Different cultures today and in different epochs have given a variety of answers to this question. It may seem self evident that every individual owns and has sovereignty over his or her own body parts, such as the head, legs, nose, stomach, pancreas, and other body parts. The sex organs, however, seem to be an exception. Even though they are as much an integral part of the individual as a leg or a liver, the sex organs are unique in that many cultures have established laws and taboos over the use and even the mere display of the sex organs. Thus, certain cultures have placed constraints over the individual's ownership of his or her sex organs and actively regulate and restrict the individual's access and use of those organs. In other cultures, the question of ownership of the sex organs is more decisively answered. In any culture where circumcision to any degree of either the male or female is practiced, permitted, encouraged, or even merely tolerated, it is clear that the individual is not considered to own his own sex organs. In the United States today, the medical establishment has created an is considered acceptable and desirable that anyone for environment where it any reason can authorize or execute the amputation of the foreskin from a male child's penis.
Table of contents
- Bodily Integrity in the Biotech Era
- An Analysis of the Accuracy of the Presentation of the Human Penis in Anatomical Source Materials
- Harryman, Gary L., M.A.[a 1]
- The Importance of the Foreskin to Male Sexual Reflexes
- Meislahn, H. S., BA, MBA (et al.)
- Circumcision and Sexual Pleasure
- Denniston, George C., M.D.[a 2], M.P.H.[a 3]
- Conservative Treatment of Primary Preputial Stenosis in Adolescents
- Beaugé, Michel, M.D.[a 2]
- Penile Torts in the Courts
- Llewellyn, David, J.D.[a 4]
- The Activist’s Rights in the Workplace
- Bonner, Charles, J.D.[a 4]
- Educating the United Nations about Circumcision
- Svoboda, J. Steven, J.D.[a 4]
- Circumcision of Boys
- Hofvander, Yngve, M.D.[a 2]
- Anthropology and Female Genital Cutting (FGC)
- Sarkis, Marianne M., M.A.[a 1]
- Changes in Infibulation Practice in East Africa
- Gallo, Pia Grassivaro, Ph.D.[a 5] et al.
Something Less Than Joyful
- Glick, Leonard B., Ph.D.[a 5], M.D.[a 2]
- The Growing Jewish Circumcision Debate
- Goldman, Ronald, Ph.D.[a 5]
- My Painful Journey
- Reiss, Mark D., M.D.[a 2]
- North Carolina Medicaid and the Funding of Routine Non-Therapeutic Circumcisions
- Craig, Amber, M.A.[a 1]
- Adoption
- Hartley, Gregory J., BSc, PE
External links
Abbreviations
- ↑ a b c
Master of Arts
, Wikipedia. Retrieved 14 June 2021. - ↑ a b c d e
Doctor of Medicine
, Wikipedia. Retrieved 14 June 2021. In the United Kingdom, Ireland and some Commonwealth countries, the abbreviation MD is common. - ↑
Master of Public Health or Master of Philosophy in Public Health
, Wikipedia. Retrieved 14 June 2021. - ↑ a b c
Juris Doctor
, Wikipedia. Retrieved 13 October 2021. (Also known as Doctor of Law or Doctor of Jurisprudence.) - ↑ a b c
Doctor of Philosophy
, Wikipedia. Retrieved 16 June 2021. (Also abbreviated as D.Phil.)
References