Difference between revisions of "Psychological literature about male circumcision"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add links in SEEALSO section.)
(→‎Introduction: Add quotation, remove Construction Site template.)
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{Construction Site}}
 
 
This page collects and indexes '''psychological literature about male circumcision'''.
 
This page collects and indexes '''psychological literature about male circumcision'''.
  
Line 5: Line 4:
  
 
==Introduction==
 
==Introduction==
−
The [[circumcision industry]] would like parents and the public to believe that [[circumcision]] is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of [[informed consent]] typically excludes any discussion of the psychological [[trauma]], injury, and emotional effects of circumcision.<ref name="tye2023">{{REFjournal
+
The [[circumcision industry]] would like parents and the public to believe that [[circumcision]] is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of [[informed consent]] typically excludes any discussion of the psychological [[trauma]], injury, and emotional effects of circumcision.<ref name="goldwater2005">{{REFjournal
 +
|last=Goldman
 +
|first=Ronald
 +
|init=R
 +
|author-link=Ronald Goldman
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Circumcision policy: a psychosocial perspective
 +
|journal=Paedatrics & Child Health (Ottawa)
 +
|location=
 +
|date=2005-11
 +
|volume=9
 +
|issue=9
 +
|pages=630-3.
 +
|url=https://www.circumcision.org/wp-content/docs/CircumcisionPolicy_A_Psychosocial_Perspective.pdf
 +
|quote=The debate about the advisability of circumcision in English-speaking countries has typically focused on the potential health factors. The position statements of committees from national medical organizations are expected to be evidence-based; however, the contentiousness of the ongoing debate suggests that other factors are involved. Various potential factors related to psychology, sociology, religion and culture may also underlie policy decisions
 +
|pubmedID=19675851
 +
|pubmedCID=2724127
 +
|DOI=10.1093/pch/9.9.630
 +
|format=PDF
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-24
 +
}}</ref><ref name="tye2023">{{REFjournal
 
  |last=Tye
 
  |last=Tye
 
  |first=
 
  |first=
Line 687: Line 706:
 
}}
 
}}
 
* {{BoyleGJ GoldmanR SvobodaJS FernandezE 2002}}
 
* {{BoyleGJ GoldmanR SvobodaJS FernandezE 2002}}
 +
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last=Frisch
 +
|first=
 +
|init=M
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=Simonsen
 +
|first2=
 +
|init2=J
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Ritual circumcision and risk of autism spectrum disorder in 0- to 9-year-old boys: national cohort study in Denmark
 +
|journal=J R Soc Med
 +
|location=
 +
|date=2015-07
 +
|volume=108
 +
|issue=7
 +
|pages=266-79
 +
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530408/
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=25573114
 +
|pubmedCID=4530408
 +
|DOI=10.1177/0141076814565942
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-24
 +
}}
 
* {{REFjournal
 
* {{REFjournal
 
  |last=Aydogmus
 
  |last=Aydogmus
Line 774: Line 817:
 
  |DOI=10.1177/0003065116659443  
 
  |DOI=10.1177/0003065116659443  
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-23
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-23
 +
}}
 +
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last=Hirota
 +
|first=
 +
|init=T
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=King
 +
|first2=
 +
|init2=BH
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|etal=yes
 +
|title=Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=JAMA
 +
|location=
 +
|date=2023-01-10
 +
|volume=329
 +
|issue=2
 +
|article=
 +
|page=
 +
|pages=147-68
 +
|url=https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2800182?guestAccessKey=ed7c3ab4-13c4-4e61-b07d-9450c0aa0221
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=36625807
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=10.1001/jama.2022.23661
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-24
 
}}
 
}}
 
* {{REFjournal
 
* {{REFjournal

Revision as of 17:39, 24 June 2024

This page collects and indexes psychological literature about male circumcision.

Work in progress: The following information does not claim to be complete. More content will be added gradually.

Introduction

The circumcision industry would like parents and the public to believe that circumcision is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of informed consent typically excludes any discussion of the psychological trauma, injury, and emotional effects of circumcision.[1][2]

Some of the literature cited here will include certain articles of a psychological nature that appeared in medical journals.

Articles

Twentieth century articles

Twenty-first century articles

See also

References

  1. ↑ REFjournal Goldman R. Circumcision policy: a psychosocial perspective PDF. Paedatrics & Child Health (Ottawa). November 2005; 9(9): 630-3.. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 24 June 2024.
    Quote: The debate about the advisability of circumcision in English-speaking countries has typically focused on the potential health factors. The position statements of committees from national medical organizations are expected to be evidence-based; however, the contentiousness of the ongoing debate suggests that other factors are involved. Various potential factors related to psychology, sociology, religion and culture may also underlie policy decisions
  2. ↑ REFjournal Tye MC, Sardi LM. Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision. Int J Impot Res. May 2023; 35(3): 242-8. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
    Quote: Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Psychological_literature_about_male_circumcision&oldid=38684"