HIV: Difference between revisions

 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 59: Line 59:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


[[Gregory J. Boyle|Boyle]] & [[George Hill|Hill]] (2011) studied their reports and found disabling methodological and statistical errors that invalidated their purported findings.<ref name="boyle-hill2011">{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref>
[[Gregory J. Boyle|Boyle]] & [[George Hill|Hill]] (2011) studied their reports and found disabling methodological and statistical errors that invalidated their purported findings.<ref name="boyle-hill2011">{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref> <ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Masem
|first=
|init=M
|author-link=
|etal=no
|title=Benefits of male circumcision
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=JAMA Network
|date=2012-02-01
|volume=307
|issue=5
|article=
|page=
|pages=
|url=https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/1104924#25424493
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=22298670
|DOI=10.1001/jama.2012.59
|accessdate=2026-03-11
}}</ref>


A circumcision program in Kenya failed to reduce the incidence of HIV infection. In fact, the incidence of infection rose from 3.5% to 3.8%. The circumcision program was deemed to be a total failure.<ref>{{REFnews
A circumcision program in Kenya failed to reduce the incidence of HIV infection. In fact, the incidence of infection rose from 3.5% to 3.8%. The circumcision program was deemed to be a total failure.<ref>{{REFnews
Line 112: Line 134:
  |format=
  |format=
  |quote=
  |quote=
}}</ref> The [[United States government]] will no longer pay for harmful circumcisions in Africa.
}}</ref> The [[United States]] government will no longer pay for harmful circumcisions in Africa.


== Population-based studies ==
== Population-based studies ==