Sexual injury of circumcision: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m adjusted REFjournal
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m using Template:Sorrells etal 2007
Line 81: Line 81:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


Therefore, it appears that Masters & Johnson (1966) performed little or no testing on the foreskins of their few intact subjects and provided no useful information.<ref name="sorrells2007">{{REFjournal
Therefore, it appears that Masters & Johnson (1966) performed little or no testing on the foreskins of their few intact subjects and provided no useful information.<ref name="sorrells2007">{{Sorrells etal 2007}}</ref>
|last=Sorrells
|first=Morris L.
|init=ML
|author-link=Morris L. Sorrells
|last2=Snyder
|first2=James L.
|init2=JL
|last3=Reiss
|first3=Mark D.
|init3=MD
|last4=Eden
|first4=Christopher
|init4=C
|last5=Milos
|first5=Marilyn F.
|init5=MF
|author5-link=Marilyn Fayre Milos
|last6=Wilcox
|first6=Norma
|init6=N
|last7=Van Howe
|first7=Robert S.
|init7=RS
|author7-link=Robert Van Howe
|title=Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis
|journal=BJU Int
|volume=99
|issue=4
|pages=864-869
|url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/118508429/PDFSTART
|quote=
|pubmedID=17378847
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06685.x
|date=2007-03
|accessdate=2019-12-16
}}</ref>


The inaccurate reports of Kinsey (1948) and Masters & Johnson (1966) have long distorted the American view of the sexual effects of [[circumcision]] and the loss of the [[foreskin]].
The inaccurate reports of Kinsey (1948) and Masters & Johnson (1966) have long distorted the American view of the sexual effects of [[circumcision]] and the loss of the [[foreskin]].