Sexual injury of circumcision: Difference between revisions
m adjusted REFjournal |
m using Template:Sorrells etal 2007 |
||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Therefore, it appears that Masters & Johnson (1966) performed little or no testing on the foreskins of their few intact subjects and provided no useful information.<ref name="sorrells2007">{{ | Therefore, it appears that Masters & Johnson (1966) performed little or no testing on the foreskins of their few intact subjects and provided no useful information.<ref name="sorrells2007">{{Sorrells etal 2007}}</ref> | ||
}}</ref> | |||
The inaccurate reports of Kinsey (1948) and Masters & Johnson (1966) have long distorted the American view of the sexual effects of [[circumcision]] and the loss of the [[foreskin]]. | The inaccurate reports of Kinsey (1948) and Masters & Johnson (1966) have long distorted the American view of the sexual effects of [[circumcision]] and the loss of the [[foreskin]]. | ||