Urinary tract infection: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →The UTI scare: Wikify. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 455: | Line 455: | ||
|issue=1 | |issue=1 | ||
|pages=123-132 | |pages=123-132 | ||
}}</ref> so the majority of its young male client population would have necessarily remained [[intact]]. The observation that 95% of the boys were not circumcised, therefore, indicated nothing more than that the majority of male infant patients at Parkland Hospital were not circumcised. | }}</ref> so the majority of its young male client population would have necessarily remained [[intact]]. The observation that 95% of the boys were not [[circumcised]], therefore, indicated nothing more than that the majority of male infant patients at Parkland Hospital were not circumcised. | ||
Wiswell's retrospective reviews of old hospital records failed to take a few factors into account: | Wiswell's retrospective reviews of old hospital records failed to take a few factors into account: | ||
| Line 491: | Line 491: | ||
}}</ref> There is a significant false-positive rate in diagnosing UTI when [[urine]] cultures alone are used.<ref name="Mueller 1997"/><ref name="Saez-Llorens 1989"/> This criticism was addressed to some extent in Wiswell's second review.<ref name="Wiswell 1986"/> | }}</ref> There is a significant false-positive rate in diagnosing UTI when [[urine]] cultures alone are used.<ref name="Mueller 1997"/><ref name="Saez-Llorens 1989"/> This criticism was addressed to some extent in Wiswell's second review.<ref name="Wiswell 1986"/> | ||
* The hospital chart data used in the retrospective studies are unreliable. Hospitals frequently omit to record a circumcision on a baby's chart. In Atlanta, O'Brien found that circumcision was recorded only 84.3% of the time for circumcised boys.<ref>{{REFjournal | * The hospital chart data used in the retrospective studies are unreliable. Hospitals frequently omit to record a [[circumcision]] on a baby's chart. In Atlanta, O'Brien found that circumcision was recorded only 84.3% of the time for circumcised boys.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last=O'Brien | |last=O'Brien | ||
|init=TR | |init=TR | ||
| Line 503: | Line 503: | ||
|issue=88 | |issue=88 | ||
|pages=411-415 | |pages=411-415 | ||
}}</ref> If the records used in the retrospective bacteriuria studies are similarly inaccurate, then a statistically significant number of the infants with bacteriuria that were claimed to be intact were, in fact, circumcised. This would naturally overstate the rate of infection in intact boys.<ref>{{REFjournal | }}</ref> If the records used in the retrospective bacteriuria studies are similarly inaccurate, then a statistically significant number of the infants with bacteriuria that were claimed to be [[intact]] were, in fact, [[circumcised]]. This would naturally overstate the rate of infection in intact boys.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Van Howe | |last=Van Howe | ||
|init=RS | |init=RS | ||