Difference between revisions of "Longer foreskin is favored"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Jewish men in Greek society)
(→‎Jewish men in Greek society: Add text and citation.)
Line 88: Line 88:
 
[[Circumcised]] Jewish men encountered significant issues when they tried to blend into Greek society.
 
[[Circumcised]] Jewish men encountered significant issues when they tried to blend into Greek society.
  
−
Key features of Hellenistic culture were athletic exercises in gymnasia and athletic performances in public arenas, where men appeared in the nude. While the [[penis]] sheathed in an [[intact]] foreskin was normal and acceptable, ancient Greeks and their Hellenistic successors considered the [[circumcised]] penis to be offensive, as it was perceived as a vulgar imitation of [[erection]], unfit for public display. The ancient Greeks and their Hellenistic successors considered the "ideal prepuce" to be long, tapered, and "well-proportioned." Removing it was considered [[mutilation]]. Men with a short [[foreskin]], a condition known as ''lypodermos'', would wear a leather cord called a ''kynodesme'' to prevent its accidental exposure.<ref name="hodges2001" /> <ref>{{REFweb
+
Key features of Hellenistic culture were athletic exercises in gymnasia and athletic performances in public arenas, where men appeared in the nude. While the [[penis]] sheathed in an [[intact]] foreskin was normal and acceptable, ancient Greeks and their Hellenistic successors considered the [[circumcised]] penis to be offensive, as it was perceived as a vulgar imitation of [[erection]], unfit for public display. The ancient Greeks and their Hellenistic successors considered the "ideal prepuce" to be long, tapered, and "well-proportioned." The [[acroposthion]] was seen as being "the source of blissful and intense pleasurable sensations."<ref>{{REFweb
 +
|url=https://acroposthion.com/ancient-greeks-and-the-foreskin/
 +
|title=Ancient Greeks & the Foreskin
 +
|last=Anonymous
 +
|first=
 +
|init=
 +
|author-link=
 +
|publisher=Acroposthion
 +
|date=
 +
|accessdate=2025-05-11
 +
}}</ref> Removing it was considered [[mutilation]]. Men with a short [[foreskin]], a condition known as ''lypodermos'', would wear a leather cord called a ''kynodesme'' to prevent its accidental exposure.<ref name="hodges2001" /> <ref>{{REFweb
 
  |url=https://acroposthion.com/foreskin-restoration-2/
 
  |url=https://acroposthion.com/foreskin-restoration-2/
 
  |title=Foreskin restoration
 
  |title=Foreskin restoration
Line 100: Line 110:
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
  
−
The sight of [[circumcised]] genitals at public baths or gymnasia would inspire laughter and ridicule. Jewish men, who wished to gain acceptance in the larger social world and needed a full-length [[foreskin]] to cover their [[glans penis]], gave themselves a presentable appearance by pulling the remaining [[foreskin]] forward as far as possible, and keeping it under enough tension to encourage permanent [[stretching]] toward its original length. Using a fibular pin or a cord, they pierced the front of the remaining foreskin, drew it forward, and fixed it in place; sometimes they would attach a weight to maintain tension. Over time the foreskin [[tissue expansion| expanded]] and restored at least some of the appearance of an [[intact]] organ.<ref name="glick2005" /> and [[epispasm]] was invented. Up until the 2th century, [[Jewish circumcision]] involved only partial foreskin removal.  
+
The sight of [[circumcised]] genitals at public baths or gymnasia would inspire laughter and ridicule. Jewish men, who wished to gain acceptance in the larger social world and needed a full-length [[foreskin]] to cover their [[glans penis]], gave themselves a presentable appearance by pulling the remaining [[foreskin]] forward as far as possible, and keeping it under enough tension to encourage permanent [[stretching]] toward its original length. Using a fibular pin or a cord, they pierced the front of the remaining foreskin, drew it forward, and fixed it in place; sometimes they would attach a weight to maintain tension. Over time the foreskin [[tissue expansion| expanded]] and restored at least some of the appearance of an [[intact]] organ.<ref name="glick2005" /> and [[epispasm]] was invented. Up until the 2th century, [[Jewish circumcision]] involved only partial foreskin removal.
 +
 
 
===Jewish response to epispasm===
 
===Jewish response to epispasm===
 
Rabbis of the second century responded to the practice of epispasm to increase the injury by mandating ''[[Periah| peri’ah]]'' to change Jewish circumcision, or the complete ablation of the [[foreskin]] in order to prevent Jewish men from engaging in [[foreskin restoration]].<ref name="glick2005" />
 
Rabbis of the second century responded to the practice of epispasm to increase the injury by mandating ''[[Periah| peri’ah]]'' to change Jewish circumcision, or the complete ablation of the [[foreskin]] in order to prevent Jewish men from engaging in [[foreskin restoration]].<ref name="glick2005" />

Revision as of 16:11, 11 June 2025

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

Longer foreskin is favored, starting with the ancient Greeks,[1] by many men.

Ancient times

According to James DeMeo (1989), male circumcision (MGM) originated in northeast Africa before the start of recorded history.[2] The Hebrews learned about circumcision durng their stay in Egypt.[3] Moses was not circumcised and did not require circumcision, however Joshua did require circumcision, so the males were circumcised when they camped at Gilgal, just west of the Jordan River.[4]

Later, chapter seventeen was inserted into Genesis to cover the institution of circumcision.[5]

Jewish men in Greek society

Circumcised Jewish men encountered significant issues when they tried to blend into Greek society.

Key features of Hellenistic culture were athletic exercises in gymnasia and athletic performances in public arenas, where men appeared in the nude. While the penis sheathed in an intact foreskin was normal and acceptable, ancient Greeks and their Hellenistic successors considered the circumcised penis to be offensive, as it was perceived as a vulgar imitation of erection, unfit for public display. The ancient Greeks and their Hellenistic successors considered the "ideal prepuce" to be long, tapered, and "well-proportioned." The acroposthion was seen as being "the source of blissful and intense pleasurable sensations."[6] Removing it was considered mutilation. Men with a short foreskin, a condition known as lypodermos, would wear a leather cord called a kynodesme to prevent its accidental exposure.[1] [7]

The sight of circumcised genitals at public baths or gymnasia would inspire laughter and ridicule. Jewish men, who wished to gain acceptance in the larger social world and needed a full-length foreskin to cover their glans penis, gave themselves a presentable appearance by pulling the remaining foreskin forward as far as possible, and keeping it under enough tension to encourage permanent stretching toward its original length. Using a fibular pin or a cord, they pierced the front of the remaining foreskin, drew it forward, and fixed it in place; sometimes they would attach a weight to maintain tension. Over time the foreskin expanded and restored at least some of the appearance of an intact organ.[5] and epispasm was invented. Up until the 2th century, Jewish circumcision involved only partial foreskin removal.

Jewish response to epispasm

Rabbis of the second century responded to the practice of epispasm to increase the injury by mandating peri’ah to change Jewish circumcision, or the complete ablation of the foreskin in order to prevent Jewish men from engaging in foreskin restoration.[5] It is clear that the circumcised Jewish men of antiquity needed a long, full-length foreskin to function in Greek society. It is not clear what other advantages may have been found.

Modern times

See also

References

  1. ↑ a b REFjournal Hodges FM. The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece and Rome: Male Genital Aesthetics and Their Relation to Lipodermos, Circumcision, Foreskin Restoration, and the Kynodesme. Bulletin History Med. 2001 (Fall); 75: 375-401. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 10 July 2025.
  2. ↑ REFjournal DeMeo J. The Geography of Genital Mutilations. The Truth Seeker. July 1989; : 9-13. Retrieved 10 June 2025.
  3. ↑ REFjournal Offord J. Restrictions concerning circumcision under the Romans. Proc R Soc Med. 1913; 6 (Sect Hist Med): 102-7. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 10 June 2025.
  4. ↑ REFweb Anonymous (2008). Gilgal, Jewish Encyclopeda. Retrieved 10 June 2025.
  5. ↑ a b c REFbook Glick LB (2005): Chapter One, in: Marked in Your Flesh: Circumcision from Ancient Judea to Modern America. Edition: 1st. Oxford University Press. Pp. 15-18. ISBN 9780195176742. Retrieved 10 June 2025.
  6. ↑ REFweb Anonymous. Ancient Greeks & the Foreskin, Acroposthion. Retrieved 11 May 2025.
  7. ↑ REFweb Anonymous. Foreskin restoration, Acroposthion. Retrieved 11 June 2025.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Longer_foreskin_is_favored&oldid=42388"