Circumcision myths and facts

From IntactiWiki
Revision as of 15:28, 12 November 2021 by WikiAdmin (talk | contribs) (fixed SEEALSO link)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

There are many myths surrounding the topic of circumcision that try to justify the foreskin amputation, which is medically unnecessary. They are all unproven and scientifically refuted. In addition, they are legally on extremely thin ice, since human rights also apply to babies and children.

This article which was inspired by intactivist Shalea Self, tries to list them in an alphabetical order to help people find arguments against forced circumcision on minors (aka foreskin amputation aka genital mutilation) easier.

Work in progress: The following information does not claim to be complete. More content will be added gradually.

Cancer

Circumcision does not reduce the risk.

Trauma

Wondered what your baby went through?

HIV

Circumcision does not reduce the risk.

HIV resources:

Pain

Long term consequences of high levels of pain in infants

Pain of circumcision and inadequate pain relief:

96% of infants circumcised are done so without pain relief. The pain relief given (remaining 4%) is proven only mild relief with infant heart rate, blood pressure, and cortisol levels still rising greatly during the procedure:

Pain management/The effectiveness of anesthesia:

Penile inflammation

In young boys ...

Psychological consequences

of circumcision

Permanent trauma on the boys brain:

Risks

of circumcision:

Sensitivity

Decrease in penile sensitivity long term.

SIDS

Increased risk due to circumcision.

STI

Circumcision does not reduce the risk.

UTI

and Circumcision

UTI are a complication of circumcision:

UTI resources:

Research by subtopic:

Other aspects

Nursing home debate

See also