Difference between revisions of "Psychological literature about male circumcision"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Introduction: Add quotation, remove Construction Site template.)
(Add article.)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 577: Line 577:
 
  |quote=It was only in the last three years that American parents discovered the longstanding practice of surgeons to operate on infants without the use of painkillers (Birth, June 1986, Letters, 124-125). Adding horror to this discovery, parents uncovered the fact that major surgery on premature infants and children up to 15 months of age was typically done with the aid of curare (Pavulon) which paralyzes them but does not relieve pain. Thus, while experiencing the surgery fully, it was not possible for them to move or to utter a cry of alarm!
 
  |quote=It was only in the last three years that American parents discovered the longstanding practice of surgeons to operate on infants without the use of painkillers (Birth, June 1986, Letters, 124-125). Adding horror to this discovery, parents uncovered the fact that major surgery on premature infants and children up to 15 months of age was typically done with the aid of curare (Pavulon) which paralyzes them but does not relieve pain. Thus, while experiencing the surgery fully, it was not possible for them to move or to utter a cry of alarm!
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-23
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-23
 +
}}
 +
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last=van der Kolk
 +
|first=
 +
|init=BA
 +
|author-link=Bessel van der Kolk
 +
|last2=Saporta
 +
|first2=
 +
|init2=J
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=The biological mechanisms and treatment of intrusion and numbing
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=Anxiety Research
 +
|location=
 +
|date=1991
 +
|volume=4
 +
|issue=
 +
|pages=199-212
 +
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/psych/vanderkolk2/
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=This article relates these findings to the studies which have demonstrated clear linkages between childhood trauma, and a variety of psychiatric disorders, including borderline personality disorder, and a range of self-destructive behaviors.
 +
|pubmedID=
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=10.1080/08917779108248774
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-28
 
}}
 
}}
 
* {{REFjournal
 
* {{REFjournal
Line 642: Line 669:
 
}}
 
}}
 
* {{TaddioA KatzJ IlersichAL KorenG 1997}}
 
* {{TaddioA KatzJ IlersichAL KorenG 1997}}
 +
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last=Maguire
 +
|first=
 +
|init=P
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=Parkes
 +
|first2=
 +
|init2=CM
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Surgery and loss of body parts
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=BMJ
 +
|location=
 +
|date=1998
 +
|volume=316
 +
|issue=7137
 +
|pages=1068-8
 +
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/psych/maguire/
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=The loss of body parts can give rise to grief for loss of body image or function, or both.
 +
|pubmedID= 9552917
 +
|pubmedCID=1112908
 +
|DOI=10.1136/bmj.316.7143.1521
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-28
 +
}}
 +
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last=Parkes
 +
|first=
 +
|init=CM
 +
|author-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Facing loss
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=BMJ
 +
|location=
 +
|date=1998-05-16
 +
|volume=316
 +
|issue=
 +
|pages=1521-4
 +
|url=https://www.bmj.com/content/316/7143/1521.full
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=Although the death of a spouse or child is a public event that seldom goes unrecognised, many other types of loss do not attract attention or support to those who suffer them. This has been called disenfranchised grief.
 +
|pubmedID=9582150
 +
|pubmedCID=1113165
 +
|DOI=10.1136/bmj.316.7143.1521
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-28
 +
}}
 
* {{REFjournal
 
* {{REFjournal
 
  |last=Goldman
 
  |last=Goldman
Line 794: Line 871:
 
  |format=PDF
 
  |format=PDF
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-24
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-24
 +
}}
 +
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last=Hill
 +
|init=G
 +
|author-link=George Hill
 +
|url=https://genitalwholeness.wordpress.com/article/circumcision-and-human-behavior-2y9nanfagw8nr-13/
 +
|title=Circumcision and Human Behavior: The emotional and behavioral effects of circumcision
 +
|journal=Genital Wholeness
 +
|date=2012-05-27
 +
|volume=
 +
|issue=
 +
|pages=
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-28
 
}}
 
}}
 
* {{REFjournal
 
* {{REFjournal
Line 896: Line 986:
  
 
[[Category:Circumcision]]
 
[[Category:Circumcision]]
 +
[[Category:Literature]]
 
[[Category:Male sexuality]]
 
[[Category:Male sexuality]]
 
[[Category:Psychology]]
 
[[Category:Psychology]]
 
[[Category:Trauma]]
 
[[Category:Trauma]]

Latest revision as of 16:34, 28 June 2024

This page collects and indexes psychological literature about male circumcision.

Work in progress: The following information does not claim to be complete. More content will be added gradually.

Introduction

The circumcision industry would like parents and the public to believe that circumcision is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of informed consent typically excludes any discussion of the psychological trauma, injury, and emotional effects of circumcision.[1][2]

Some of the literature cited here will include certain articles of a psychological nature that appeared in medical journals.

Articles

Twentieth century articles

Twenty-first century articles

See also

References

  1. ↑ REFjournal Goldman R. Circumcision policy: a psychosocial perspective PDF. Paedatrics & Child Health (Ottawa). November 2005; 9(9): 630-3.. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 24 June 2024.
    Quote: The debate about the advisability of circumcision in English-speaking countries has typically focused on the potential health factors. The position statements of committees from national medical organizations are expected to be evidence-based; however, the contentiousness of the ongoing debate suggests that other factors are involved. Various potential factors related to psychology, sociology, religion and culture may also underlie policy decisions
  2. ↑ REFjournal Tye MC, Sardi LM. Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision. Int J Impot Res. May 2023; 35(3): 242-8. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
    Quote: Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Psychological_literature_about_male_circumcision&oldid=38716"