Difference between revisions of "Psychological literature about male circumcision"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Twenty-first century articles: Place articles in chronological order.)
(→‎Twenty-first century articles: Add article.)
Line 923: Line 923:
 
  |format=PDF
 
  |format=PDF
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-24
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-24
 +
}}
 +
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last=Narvaez
 +
|init=DF
 +
|author-link=Darcia Narvaez
 +
|url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage
 +
|title=Circumcision’s Psychological Damage
 +
|journal=Psychology Today
 +
|date=2015-01-11
 +
|volume=
 +
|issue=
 +
|pages=
 +
|quote=The control group babies were in so much pain—some began choking and one even had a seizure—they decided it was unethical to continue. It is important to also consider the effects of post-operative pain in circumcised infants (regardless of whether anesthesia is used), which is described as “severe” and “persistent”.
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-28
 
}}
 
}}
 
* {{REFjournal
 
* {{REFjournal
Line 937: Line 951:
 
  |quote=Medical doctors adopted male circumcision from religious practice into medical practice in England in the 1860s and in the United States in the 1870s. No thought was given to the possible behavioral effects of painful operations that excise important protective erogenous tissue from the male phallus.
 
  |quote=Medical doctors adopted male circumcision from religious practice into medical practice in England in the 1860s and in the United States in the 1870s. No thought was given to the possible behavioral effects of painful operations that excise important protective erogenous tissue from the male phallus.
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-28
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-28
 +
}}
 +
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last=Boyle
 +
|first=
 +
|init=GJ
 +
|author-link=Gregory J. Boyle
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Circumcision of Infants and Children: Short-Term Trauma and Long-Term Psychosexual Harm
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=Advances in Sexual Medicine
 +
|location=
 +
|date=2015-04-16
 +
|volume=5
 +
|issue=2
 +
|article=55727
 +
|page=
 +
|pages=
 +
|url=https://www.scirp.org/html/3-1990071_55727.htm
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=10.4236/asm.2015.52004
 +
|accessdate=2024-07-02
 
}}
 
}}
 
* {{REFjournal
 
* {{REFjournal
Line 1,006: Line 1,045:
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-22
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-22
 
}}
 
}}
−
* {{REFjournal
+
 
−
|last=Narvaez
 
−
|init=DF
 
−
|author-link=Darcia Narvaez
 
−
|url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage
 
−
|title=Circumcision’s Psychological Damage
 
−
|journal=Psychology Today
 
−
|date=2015-01-11
 
−
|volume=
 
−
|issue=
 
−
|pages=
 
−
|quote=The control group babies were in so much pain—some began choking and one even had a seizure—they decided it was unethical to continue. It is important to also consider the effects of post-operative pain in circumcised infants (regardless of whether anesthesia is used), which is described as “severe” and “persistent”.
 
−
|accessdate=2024-06-28
 
−
}}
 
 
* {{REFjournal
 
* {{REFjournal
 
  |last=Narvaez
 
  |last=Narvaez

Revision as of 18:55, 2 July 2024

This page collects and indexes psychological literature about male circumcision.

Work in progress: The following information does not claim to be complete. More content will be added gradually.

Introduction

The circumcision industry would like parents and the public to believe that circumcision is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of informed consent typically excludes any discussion of the psychological trauma, injury, and emotional effects of circumcision.[1][2]

Some of the literature cited here will include certain articles of a psychological nature that appeared in medical journals.

Articles

Twentieth century articles

Twenty-first century articles

See also

References

  1. ↑ REFjournal Goldman R. Circumcision policy: a psychosocial perspective PDF. Paedatrics & Child Health (Ottawa). November 2005; 9(9): 630-3.. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 24 June 2024.
    Quote: The debate about the advisability of circumcision in English-speaking countries has typically focused on the potential health factors. The position statements of committees from national medical organizations are expected to be evidence-based; however, the contentiousness of the ongoing debate suggests that other factors are involved. Various potential factors related to psychology, sociology, religion and culture may also underlie policy decisions
  2. ↑ REFjournal Tye MC, Sardi LM. Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision. Int J Impot Res. May 2023; 35(3): 242-8. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
    Quote: Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Psychological_literature_about_male_circumcision&oldid=38760"