Difference between revisions of "Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Initiatives: Revise link.)
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
The organization '''Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.) - Physicians for Genital Integrity''' supports the [[WWDOGA]]. D.O.C. has members in 50 States, 12 Canadian Provinces and Territories, and in nations on six continents. DOC is headquartered in Seattle, Washington, United States. DOC combines expertise in medicine with expertise in law. Contributions to DOC are tax-deductible charitable contributions. DOC is a member of [https://archive.crin.org/| Child Rights Information Network]. DOC claims members on six continents.
 
The organization '''Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.) - Physicians for Genital Integrity''' supports the [[WWDOGA]]. D.O.C. has members in 50 States, 12 Canadian Provinces and Territories, and in nations on six continents. DOC is headquartered in Seattle, Washington, United States. DOC combines expertise in medicine with expertise in law. Contributions to DOC are tax-deductible charitable contributions. DOC is a member of [https://archive.crin.org/| Child Rights Information Network]. DOC claims members on six continents.
  
−
They are an international network of physicians dedicated to protecting the genital integrity and eventual autonomy of all children, serving both health professionals and the public through education, support, and advocacy.<ref>{{REFweb
+
They are an international network of physicians dedicated to protecting the [[genital integrity]] and eventual autonomy of all children, serving both health professionals and the public through education, support, and advocacy.<ref>{{REFweb
 
  |quote=
 
  |quote=
 
  |url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/about-us/
 
  |url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/about-us/
Line 18: Line 18:
 
* [[Mark Reiss]], Executive Vice-President
 
* [[Mark Reiss]], Executive Vice-President
 
* [[George Hill]], Vice-President for Medical Science and Bioethics
 
* [[George Hill]], Vice-President for Medical Science and Bioethics
 +
* [[Steve Scott]], Vice-President for Anatomical Research
 
* [[John V. Geisheker]], Executive Director and General Counsel
 
* [[John V. Geisheker]], Executive Director and General Counsel
 
* [[Zenas Baer]], Member
 
* [[Zenas Baer]], Member
Line 24: Line 25:
 
* [[Mathias Masem]], Member
 
* [[Mathias Masem]], Member
 
* [[Amanda Morse]], Member
 
* [[Amanda Morse]], Member
−
* [[James L. Snyder]] Member
+
* [[James L. Snyder]], Member
 +
* [[Leif Thompson]], Member
 
* [[Michaelle Wetteland]], Member
 
* [[Michaelle Wetteland]], Member
 
* [[Michelle Storms]], Advisor
 
* [[Michelle Storms]], Advisor
Line 32: Line 34:
 
==History==
 
==History==
  
−
DOC was founded by University of Washington Medical School Professor George C. Denniston, MD, MPH, in 1995 to support genital integrity for children and to discourage the surgical genital modification for cultural practices.
+
DOC was founded by {{UNI|University of Washington|UW}} Medical School Professor [[George C. Denniston]], {{MD}}, {{MPH}}, in 1995 to support [[genital integrity]] for children and to discourage the surgical genital modification for cultural practices.
  
 
==Governance==
 
==Governance==
  
−
Doctors Opposing Circumcision is governed by a board of directors. As of 2019, Denniston served as chairman of the board and president and John V. Geisheker, J.D., served as executive director.
+
[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] is governed by a board of directors. As of 2019, Denniston served as chairman of the board and president and [[John V. Geisheker]], {{JD}}, served as executive director.
  
 
==Litigation==
 
==Litigation==
  
−
DOC intervened in the Oregon case of ''[[Boldt vs Boldt]]'', which technically was a child custody case, but actually about parental power to circumcise at will, by filing two ''amicus curiae'' educational briefs to help the court. As a result of DOC's intervention, the [https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/appellate/supreme/Pages/default.aspx| Oregon Supreme Court] remanded the case to the trial court with instructions to determine the child's wishes regarding circumcision.<ref>[https://www.courtlistener.com/html/2008/01/2/boldt_and_boldt_2.html| In the Matter of the Marriage of James H. Boldt]. 176 P.3d 388 (SC Oregon 2008).</ref> DOC's intervention was cited by the court in its written opinion. The trial court determined that the child did not want to be circumcised and custody was changed from the father to the mother. This landmark case received critical comment in the medical ethics literature.<ref>{{REFweb
+
DOC intervened in the Oregon case of ''[[Boldt vs Boldt]]'', which technically was a child custody case, but actually about parental power to circumcise at will, by filing two ''amicus curiae'' educational briefs to help the court. As a result of DOC's intervention, the [https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/appellate/supreme/Pages/default.aspx| Oregon Supreme Court] remanded the case to the trial court with instructions to determine the child's wishes regarding circumcision.<ref>[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/835348/marriage-of-boldt/| In the Matter of the Marriage of James H. Boldt]. [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/835348/marriage-of-boldt/ 176 P.3d 388 (SC Oregon 2008)].</ref> DOC's intervention was cited by the court in its written opinion. The trial court determined that the child did not want to be circumcised and custody was changed from the father to the mother. This landmark case received critical comment in the medical ethics literature.<ref>{{REFweb
 
  |url=http://www.circinfo.org/Boldt_case.html
 
  |url=http://www.circinfo.org/Boldt_case.html
 
  |title=American legal precedent confirms child’s right to reject circumcision: The case of Boldt v. Boldt  
 
  |title=American legal precedent confirms child’s right to reject circumcision: The case of Boldt v. Boldt  
−
|last=
 
−
|first=
 
−
|publisher=
 
 
  |website=Circumcision Information Australia
 
  |website=Circumcision Information Australia
−
|date=
 
 
  |accessdate=2019-09-27
 
  |accessdate=2019-09-27
−
  |format=
+
}}</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Initiatives==
 +
[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] (2020) has called on Ambassador Deborah L. Birx, {{MD}}, {{MPH}}, the head of [[PEPFAR]], to suspend the provision of male [[circumcision]], because it is ineffective and to re-direct those funds to the provision of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) and condoms.<ref name="denniston2020">{{REFdocument
 +
|title=World Health Organization, HIV, and male circumcision
 +
|url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2020-06-15b_LettertoPEPFAR.pdf
 +
|last=Denniston
 +
|first=George C.
 +
|author-link=George C. Denniston
 +
|publisher=[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]]
 +
|format=PDF
 +
|date=2020-06-29
 +
|accessdate=2020-09-02
 +
}}</ref>
 +
{{PUB}}
 +
* {{REFdocument
 +
|title=Genital Integrity Policy Statement
 +
|url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2008_Genital_Integrity_Policy_Statement.pdf
 +
|last=Hill
 +
|first=George
 +
|author-link=George Hill
 +
|publisher=[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]]
 +
|format=PDF
 +
|date=2008-06
 +
|accessdate=2024-11-03
 +
}}
 +
* {{REFweb
 +
|url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/commentary-on-american-academy-of-pediatrics-2012-circumcision-policy-statement.pdf
 +
|title=Commentary on American Academy of Pediatrics 2012 Circumcision Policy Statement
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|last=Hill
 +
|first=George
 +
|author-link=George Hill
 +
|publisher=[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]]
 +
|website=
 +
|date=2013-04
 +
|accessdate=2020-02-15
 +
  |format=PDF
 
  |quote=
 
  |quote=
−
}}</ref>
+
}}
  
 
{{LINKS}}
 
{{LINKS}}
 
* {{URLwebsite|http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org|2019-09-18}}
 
* {{URLwebsite|http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org|2019-09-18}}
−
 
+
* {{REFnews
 +
|title=Touch-test study finds circumcised males significantly less sensitive
 +
|url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2007/2007-03-19doc.php
 +
|last=Anonymous
 +
|first=
 +
|init=
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=
 +
|init2=
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|publisher=Press Release
 +
|website=
 +
|date=2007-03-19
 +
|accessdate=2024-07-28
 +
|quote=
 +
}}
 +
{{ABBR}}
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
  
 
[[Category:Intactivism organization]]
 
[[Category:Intactivism organization]]
 +
 +
[[Category:Acronym]]
 +
 
[[Category:USA]]
 
[[Category:USA]]
−
[[Category:Acronym]]
 
  
 
[[de:Doctors Opposing Circumcision]]
 
[[de:Doctors Opposing Circumcision]]

Latest revision as of 12:24, 3 November 2024

Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.) - official logo

The organization Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.) - Physicians for Genital Integrity supports the WWDOGA. D.O.C. has members in 50 States, 12 Canadian Provinces and Territories, and in nations on six continents. DOC is headquartered in Seattle, Washington, United States. DOC combines expertise in medicine with expertise in law. Contributions to DOC are tax-deductible charitable contributions. DOC is a member of Child Rights Information Network. DOC claims members on six continents.

They are an international network of physicians dedicated to protecting the genital integrity and eventual autonomy of all children, serving both health professionals and the public through education, support, and advocacy.[1]

Board of Directors and Advisors

History

DOC was founded by University of Washington Medical School Professor George C. Denniston, M.D.[a 1], M.P.H.[a 2], in 1995 to support genital integrity for children and to discourage the surgical genital modification for cultural practices.

Governance

Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.) is governed by a board of directors. As of 2019, Denniston served as chairman of the board and president and John V. Geisheker, J.D.[a 3], served as executive director.

Litigation

DOC intervened in the Oregon case of Boldt vs Boldt, which technically was a child custody case, but actually about parental power to circumcise at will, by filing two amicus curiae educational briefs to help the court. As a result of DOC's intervention, the Oregon Supreme Court remanded the case to the trial court with instructions to determine the child's wishes regarding circumcision.[2] DOC's intervention was cited by the court in its written opinion. The trial court determined that the child did not want to be circumcised and custody was changed from the father to the mother. This landmark case received critical comment in the medical ethics literature.[3]

Initiatives

Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.) (2020) has called on Ambassador Deborah L. Birx, M.D.[a 1], M.P.H.[a 2], the head of PEPFAR, to suspend the provision of male circumcision, because it is ineffective and to re-direct those funds to the provision of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) and condoms.[4]

Publications

External links

Abbreviations

  1. ↑ a b REFweb Doctor of Medicine, Wikipedia. Retrieved 14 June 2021. In the United Kingdom, Ireland and some Commonwealth countries, the abbreviation MD is common.
  2. ↑ a b REFweb Master of Public Health or Master of Philosophy in Public Health, Wikipedia. Retrieved 14 June 2021.
  3. ↑ REFweb Juris Doctor, Wikipedia. Retrieved 13 October 2021. (Also known as Doctor of Law or Doctor of Jurisprudence.)

References

  1. ↑ REFweb (2019). Mission Statement, D.O.C.. Retrieved 18 September 2019.
  2. ↑ In the Matter of the Marriage of James H. Boldt. 176 P.3d 388 (SC Oregon 2008).
  3. ↑ REFweb American legal precedent confirms child’s right to reject circumcision: The case of Boldt v. Boldt, Circumcision Information Australia. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
  4. ↑ REFdocument Denniston, George C.: World Health Organization, HIV, and male circumcision PDF, Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.). (29 June 2020). Retrieved 2 September 2020.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Doctors_Opposing_Circumcision_(D.O.C.)&oldid=39789"