New Zealand: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Add category.
 
(18 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Flag of New Zealand.svg|thumb|150px|Flag of New Zealand]]
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is also known by the Maori name of '''Aotearoa'''.
== Circumcision in New Zealand ==
== Circumcision in New Zealand ==


Line 31: Line 33:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


The [http://www.nzma.org.nz/ New Zealand Medical Association] estimated in 2001 that about one percent of Caucasian boys were being [[circumcised]], but nearly 100 percent of Tongan, Samoan, and Jewish boys are being circumcised.<ref name="bone2001">{{REFnews
The [http://www.nzma.org.nz/ New Zealand Medical Association] estimated in 2001 that about one percent of Caucasian boys were being [[circumcised]], but nearly 100 percent of Tongan, Samoan, and Jewish boys are being [[circumcised]].<ref name="bone2001">{{REFnews
  |title=The First Cut
  |title=The First Cut
  |url=http://www.cirp.org/news/listener11-17-01/
  |url=http://www.cirp.org/news/listener11-17-01/
Line 42: Line 44:
  |accessdate=2020-01-24
  |accessdate=2020-01-24
  |quote=
  |quote=
}}</ref> The New Zealand Public Health System does not fund non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="afsari2002">{{REFjournal
}}</ref> [https://www.govt.nz/organisations/health-nz-te-whatu-ora/ Health New Zealand] does not fund non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="afsari2002">{{REFjournal
  |last=Afsari
  |last=Afsari
  |first=Mahnaz
  |first=Mahnaz
Line 82: Line 84:
Four medical groups condemned the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision of children in 2002.<ref>{{REFnews
Four medical groups condemned the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision of children in 2002.<ref>{{REFnews
  |title=Quick snip' an unkind cut
  |title=Quick snip' an unkind cut
  |url=http://www.cirp.org/news/dominionpost08-30-02/
  |url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2002/2002-08-30_dominionpost.php
  |last=Anonymous
  |last=Anonymous
  |first=
  |first=
Line 90: Line 92:
  |date=2002-08-30
  |date=2002-08-30
  |accessdate=2019-10-28
  |accessdate=2019-10-28
  |quote=
  |quote=They say circumcision is painful, risky and often medically unnecessary.
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 99: Line 101:
But the statement also says:
But the statement also says:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
The option of leaving circumcision until later, when the boy is old enough to make a decision for himself does need to be raised with parents and considered. This option has recently been recommended by the [[Royal Dutch Medical Association]]. The ethical merit of this option is that it seeks to respect the child’s physical integrity, and capacity for autonomy by leaving the options open for him to make his own autonomous choice in the future. However, deferring the decision may not always be the best option. As noted earlier, the psychosocial benefits of circumcision (e.g. full inclusion in a religious community) may only be obtained if circumcision is done in infancy. Waiting until the boy is twelve years old or more (i.e. old enough to make his own decision) may mean losing benefits that circumcision was intended to produce.<ref name="racp2010">{{REFdocument
The option of leaving circumcision until later, when the boy is old enough to make a decision for himself does need to be raised with parents and considered. This option has recently been recommended by the [[Royal Dutch Medical Association]]. The ethical merit of this option is that it seeks to respect the child’s [[physical integrity]], and capacity for autonomy by leaving the options open for him to make his own autonomous choice in the future. However, deferring the decision may not always be the best option. As noted earlier, the psychosocial benefits of circumcision (e.g. full inclusion in a religious community) may only be obtained if circumcision is done in infancy. Waiting until the boy is twelve years old or more (i.e. old enough to make his own decision) may mean losing benefits that circumcision was intended to produce.<ref name="racp2010">{{REFdocument
  |title=Circumcision of Infant Males
  |title=Circumcision of Infant Males
  |url=https://www.racp.edu.au//docs/default-source/advocacy-library/circumcision-of-infant-males.pdf?sfvrsn=eaa32f1a_10
  |url=https://www.racp.edu.au//docs/default-source/advocacy-library/circumcision-of-infant-males.pdf?sfvrsn=eaa32f1a_10
Line 114: Line 116:
==Demographics and distribution==
==Demographics and distribution==


The males in New Zealand who are [[circumcised]] are mostly older men.  The percentage of males who are circumcised is gradually declining as older circumcised males die off and are replaced by younger [[intact]] males. Almost no white males under 35-years-of-age are circumcised.
The males in New Zealand who are [[circumcised]] are mostly older men.  The percentage of males who are circumcised is gradually declining as older [[circumcised]] males die off and are replaced by younger [[intact]] males. Almost no white males under 35-years-of-age are circumcised.


The Maori people who constitute about 17 percent of the population do not circumcise.<ref name="mcgrath-young2001" />
The Maori people, who constitute about 17 percent of the population, do not circumcise.<ref name="mcgrath-young2001" />


It is said that the small Jewish population have to fly in a ''[[mohel]]'' if they want to have a son circumcised.<ref name="mcgrath-young2001" />
It is said that the small Jewish population have to fly in a ''[[mohel]]'' if they want to have a son [[circumcised]].<ref name="mcgrath-young2001" />


The Pacific Island people who constitute 8.1 percent of the population are an exception.  The Pacific Islanders circumcise (actually a [[dorsal slit]]) as part of their culture.<ref name="afsari2002"/> <ref>{{REFnews
The Pacific Island people, who constitute 8.1 percent of the population, are an exception.  The Pacific Islanders circumcise (actually a [[dorsal slit]]) as part of their culture.<ref name="afsari2002"/> <ref>{{REFnews
  |title=Foreskin lament for babies
  |title=Foreskin lament for babies
  |url=http://www.cirp.org/news/thepress01-13-01/
  |url=http://www.cirp.org/news/thepress01-13-01/
Line 131: Line 133:
  |accessdate=2019-10-28
  |accessdate=2019-10-28
  |quote=
  |quote=
}}</ref>  
}}</ref>
 
There is now an abundant majority of [[foreskinned]] males in New Zealand.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/uncircumcised_talk/comments/1kxr198/33_born_in_nz_mixed_m%C4%81orieuro_experience_growing/
|title=33 born in NZ mixed Māori/Euro Experience growing up
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=REDDIT
|date=2025-05-27
|accessdate=2025-05-29
}}</ref> The [[World Health Organization]] reported in 2007 that fewer than 20 percent of males are [[circumcised]].


==Intactivist website==
New Zealand is the home of [[Circumstitions - The Intactivism Pages]].
{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Australia]]
* [[Australia]]
Line 141: Line 157:


{{LINKS}}
{{LINKS}}
* {{URLwikipedia|New_Zealand|New Zealand}}
* {{REFweb
* {{REFweb
  |url=http://www.circumstitions.com/NZ.html
  |url=http://www.circumstitions.com/NZ.html
Line 188: Line 205:
  |quote=
  |quote=
}}
}}
 
* {{REFweb
|url=https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/wellbeing/300958020/aggressive-circumcisions-ruined-the-lives-of-these-men
|title='Aggressive' circumcisions ruined the lives of these men
|last=Solomon
|first=Serena
|init=
|publisher=Stuff
|date=2023-08-28
|accessdate=2023-09-20
}}
* {{REFweb
|url=https://intactamerica.org/cultures-that-reject-circumcision/
|title=Cultures That Reject Circumcision—And Why They’re Right
|last=Alissa
|first=Kristel
|init=
|author-link=Kristel Alissa
|publisher=Intact America
|date=2025-02-23
|accessdate=2025-05-08
}}
{{REF}}
{{REF}}


[[Category:Circumcision]]
[[Category:Circumcision]]
[[Category:Country]]
[[Category:English-speaking nation]]
[[Category:New Zealand]]
[[Category:New Zealand]]
[[Category:Statistics]]
[[Category:Statistics]]