American Academy of Family Physicians: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Current AAFP position statement: Add citation. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Revise text. |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The ''' | The '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' (AAFP) is the [[medical trade association]] that defends and promotes the business ad financial interests of family physicians in the United States. | ||
The AAFP headquarters address is: | The AAFP headquarters address is: | ||
<blockquote> | |||
American Academy of Family Physicians<br> | American Academy of Family Physicians<br> | ||
11400 Tomahawk Creek Parkway<br> | 11400 Tomahawk Creek Parkway<br> | ||
Leawood, KS 66211-2680<br> | Leawood, KS 66211-2680<br> | ||
USA | USA | ||
</blockquote> | |||
Family physicians is one of three medical specialties who substantially profit from carrying out medically-uncessary, non-therapeutic child | Family physicians is one of three medical specialties who substantially profit from carrying out harmful, medically-uncessary, non-therapeutic child circumcision, so it should be no surprise that they promote non-therapeutic child [[circumcision]] with a very positive policy statement. | ||
The AAFP publishes the [https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp.html American Family Physician]. | The AAFP publishes the [https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp.html American Family Physician]. | ||
| Line 24: | Line 26: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
The AAFP then joined with the [[American | The AAFP then joined with the [[American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists| American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] (ACOG) and the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] (AAP) in 2008 to produce a pro-circumcision policy statement that would promote [[circumcision]] and [[third-party payment]] for non-therapeutic circumcision of children. Lesley Atwood, {{MD}}, was assigned to represent the AAFP in the development of the pro-circumcision statement. | ||
The statement was finally published by the [[AAP]] in 2012, but attracted overwhelming criticism from many sources. | The statement was finally published by the [[AAP]] in 2012, but attracted overwhelming criticism from many sources. | ||
| Line 248: | Line 250: | ||
The statement also claims "potential" health benefits, while failing to state that a "potential" health benefit is an unproven, imaginary benefit. | The statement also claims "potential" health benefits, while failing to state that a "potential" health benefit is an unproven, imaginary benefit. | ||
The statement continues the plea for insurance coverage of unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision, which actually is a plea for [[Financial incentive| more money for doctors]]. | The statement continues the plea for insurance coverage of harmful, unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision, which actually is a plea for [[Financial incentive| more money for doctors]]. | ||
The claims made are not documented with citations, nor is there an actual recommendation for circumcision. The statement continues the practice of trying to shift liability from the physician to the parents | The claims made are not documented with citations, nor is there an actual recommendation for [[circumcision]]. The statement continues the practice of trying to shift liability from the physician to the parents, for the known [[pain]], [[trauma]], and certain [[injury]] by [[amputation]] of a protective [[Foreskin| multi-functional body part]]. | ||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
* [[Circumcision study flaws]] | * [[Circumcision study flaws]] | ||
* [[United States of America]] | |||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
| Line 260: | Line 263: | ||
{{ABBR}} | {{ABBR}} | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
[[Category:Circumcision]] | [[Category:Circumcision]] | ||
| Line 269: | Line 271: | ||
[[Category:USA]] | [[Category:USA]] | ||
[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]] | |||