American Academy of Pediatrics: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Criticism: Add Svoboda paper |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →From IntactWiki: Amend text. |
||
| Line 337: | Line 337: | ||
|Title = American Academy of Pediatrics | |Title = American Academy of Pediatrics | ||
}} | }} | ||
<blockquote> | |||
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) currently advises parents on its "Healthy Children" website that "The existing scientific evidence is not sufficient to recommend routine (non-therapeutic) circumcision.<ref>{{REFweb | The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) currently advises parents on its "Healthy Children" website that "The existing scientific evidence is not sufficient to recommend routine (non-therapeutic) circumcision.<ref>{{REFweb | ||
|last= | |last= | ||
| Line 347: | Line 347: | ||
|accessdate= | |accessdate= | ||
}}</ref> Be that as it may, they still say that they "...recommend that the decision to circumcise is one best made by parents in consultation with their pediatrician." While not recommending circumcision, the AAP shirks responsibility by refusing to take a clear stand and state anything more directly negative than saying "the scientific evidence is not sufficient to recommend." The evidence, of which there is not enough for the AAP to come to a concrete conclusion, must apparently still be considered by parents, placing them in the awkward position of doing what the AAP could not do. Many view the AAP's policy as a "cover your ass" move: an awkward attempt shield itself and its members (doctors), from possible future legal repercussions, by distancing them as far as possible from any ethical considerations in the decision of parents to circumcise (while allowing its members to continue profiting from the procedure). | }}</ref> Be that as it may, they still say that they "...recommend that the decision to circumcise is one best made by parents in consultation with their pediatrician." While not recommending circumcision, the AAP shirks responsibility by refusing to take a clear stand and state anything more directly negative than saying "the scientific evidence is not sufficient to recommend." The evidence, of which there is not enough for the AAP to come to a concrete conclusion, must apparently still be considered by parents, placing them in the awkward position of doing what the AAP could not do. Many view the AAP's policy as a "cover your ass" move: an awkward attempt shield itself and its members (doctors), from possible future legal repercussions, by distancing them as far as possible from any ethical considerations in the decision of parents to circumcise (while allowing its members to continue profiting from the procedure). | ||
</blockquote> | |||
''The current text was drafted in 2014. It is based on the 2012 Circumcision Policy Statement which is discredited and has now expired.'' | |||
== The AAP briefly endorses female genital cutting == | == The AAP briefly endorses female genital cutting == | ||