Circumcision risks: Difference between revisions

Operative risks: Add links.
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m Complication rates: emphasize percentages
Line 107: Line 107:


== Complication rates ==
== Complication rates ==
In fact, of course, not all possible [[complication]] rates have the same frequency and therefore not the same relevance. It is necessary to collect statistics on which complications are serious. Basically, however, it should be noted that circumcision without a medical indication is the most unnecessary complication in itself, with a 100% rate.
In fact, of course, not all possible [[complication]] rates have the same frequency and therefore not the same relevance. It is necessary to collect statistics on which complications are serious. Basically, however, it should be noted that circumcision without a medical indication is the most unnecessary complication in itself, with a '''100% rate'''.


The German Academy of Children and Youth Medicine (DAKJ) (2012) conducted an internet survey of medical practices and determined a serious complication rate of approx. 6% based on the reported data.<ref>{{REFweb
The German Academy of Children and Youth Medicine (DAKJ) (2012) conducted an internet survey of medical practices and determined a serious complication rate of '''approx. 6%''' based on the reported data.<ref>{{REFweb
  |url=https://www.dakj.de/stellungnahmen/beschneidung-von-minderjaehrigen-jungen/
  |url=https://www.dakj.de/stellungnahmen/beschneidung-von-minderjaehrigen-jungen/
  |title=Beschneidung von minderjährigen Jungen
  |title=Beschneidung von minderjährigen Jungen
Line 116: Line 116:
  |date=2016-12-21
  |date=2016-12-21
  |accessdate=2020-11-24
  |accessdate=2020-11-24
}}</ref> Thorup ''et al.'' (2013) report that about 5.1% of the recorded complications were significant complications.<ref>{{REFjournal
}}</ref> Thorup ''et al.'' (2013) report that '''about 5.1%''' of the recorded complications were significant complications.<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Thorup
  |last=Thorup
  |init=J
  |init=J
Line 131: Line 131:
  |pubmedID=23905566
  |pubmedID=23905566
  |accessdate=2020-11-24
  |accessdate=2020-11-24
}}</ref> Zöller ''et al.'' (2014) analyzed patient data in a retrospective and find that the complication rate after male circumcision is relevant.<ref>{{REFjournal
}}</ref> Zöller ''et al.'' (2014) analyzed patient data in a retrospective and find that '''the complication rate after male circumcision is relevant'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Zöller
  |last=Zöller
  |init=C
  |init=C
Line 149: Line 149:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Patel (1966) reported a complication rate of 55% in a series at [https://kingstonhsc.ca/ Kingston General Hospital] in Ontariɔ.<ref name="patel1966">
Patel (1966) reported a complication rate of '''55%''' in a series at [https://kingstonhsc.ca/ Kingston General Hospital] in Ontariɔ.<ref name="patel1966">
{{REFjournal
{{REFjournal
  |last=Patel
  |last=Patel
Line 174: Line 174:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Williams & Kapila (1993) reviewed the complications of circumcision. They estimated a complication rate of 2 to 10 percenʈ<ref name="williams1993">{{REFjournal
Williams & Kapila (1993) reviewed the complications of circumcision. They estimated a complication rate of '''2 to 10 percent'''<ref name="williams1993">{{REFjournal
  |last=Williams
  |last=Williams
  |init=
  |init=
Line 202: Line 202:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Okeke ''et al''. (2006) investigated the incidence of circumcision complications in Ibadan, Nigeria. They reported a complication rate of 20.2 percenʈ<ref ="okeke2006">{{REFjournal
Okeke ''et al.'' (2006) investigated the incidence of circumcision complications in Ibadan, Nigeria. They reported a complication rate of '''20.2 percent'''<ref ="okeke2006">{{REFjournal
  |last=Okeke
  |last=Okeke
  |init=I
  |init=I
Line 235: Line 235:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Lau ''et al''. (2018) used the Utah [http://stats.health.utah.gov/about-the-data/ All-Payer Claims Database] to determine the incidence of circumcision and the percentage of complications for the state of Utah. The authors reported an incidence of neonatal circumcision of in Utah of 29 percent and an incidence of complications of 11.5 percenʈ.<ref name="lau2018">{{REFjournal
Lau ''et al.'' (2018) used the Utah [http://stats.health.utah.gov/about-the-data/ All-Payer Claims Database] to determine the incidence of circumcision and the percentage of complications for the state of Utah. The authors reported an incidence of neonatal circumcision of in Utah of '''29 percent''' and an incidence of complications of '''11.5 percent'''.<ref name="lau2018">{{REFjournal
  |last=Lau
  |last=Lau
  |init=
  |init=