Difference between revisions of "Psychological literature about male circumcision"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Twenty-first century articles: Add article.)
(→‎Twenty-first century articles: Add article.)
Line 829: Line 829:
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-23
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-23
 
  |note=
 
  |note=
 +
}}
 +
* {{REFconference
 +
|last=Boyle
 +
|first=GJ
 +
|author-link=Gregory J. Boyle
 +
|coauthors=
 +
|coauthors-link=
 +
|title=Los efectos adversos sobre la salud mental de larga duración como resultado de la circuncisión no terapéutica de los niños
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=Spanish
 +
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/psych/boyle4/
 +
|archived=
 +
|place=Universidad Maimónides, Buenos Aires
 +
|publisher=VI Congreso Iberoamericano de Psicología de la Salud
 +
|source=Además, la evidencia acumulada hasta ahora indica que la cirugía genital realizada en los niños puede tener efectos devastadores y crónicos para la salud mental. La creciente evidencia empírica muestra que dicha mutilación causa emociones negativas y posiblemente el trastorno por estrés postraumático PTSD de larga duración
 +
|date=
 +
|datefrom=2001-09-30
 +
|dateto=2001-10-03
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-30
 
}}
 
}}
 
* {{BoyleGJ GoldmanR SvobodaJS FernandezE 2002}}
 
* {{BoyleGJ GoldmanR SvobodaJS FernandezE 2002}}

Revision as of 17:36, 30 June 2024

This page collects and indexes psychological literature about male circumcision.

Work in progress: The following information does not claim to be complete. More content will be added gradually.

Introduction

The circumcision industry would like parents and the public to believe that circumcision is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of informed consent typically excludes any discussion of the psychological trauma, injury, and emotional effects of circumcision.[1][2]

Some of the literature cited here will include certain articles of a psychological nature that appeared in medical journals.

Articles

Twentieth century articles

Twenty-first century articles

See also

References

  1. ↑ REFjournal Goldman R. Circumcision policy: a psychosocial perspective PDF. Paedatrics & Child Health (Ottawa). November 2005; 9(9): 630-3.. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 24 June 2024.
    Quote: The debate about the advisability of circumcision in English-speaking countries has typically focused on the potential health factors. The position statements of committees from national medical organizations are expected to be evidence-based; however, the contentiousness of the ongoing debate suggests that other factors are involved. Various potential factors related to psychology, sociology, religion and culture may also underlie policy decisions
  2. ↑ REFjournal Tye MC, Sardi LM. Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision. Int J Impot Res. May 2023; 35(3): 242-8. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
    Quote: Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Psychological_literature_about_male_circumcision&oldid=38746"