New Zealand: Difference between revisions

Add external link.
Line 44: Line 44:
  |accessdate=2020-01-24
  |accessdate=2020-01-24
  |quote=
  |quote=
}}</ref> The New Zealand Public Health System does not fund non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="afsari2002">{{REFjournal
}}</ref> [https://www.govt.nz/organisations/health-nz-te-whatu-ora/ Health New Zealand] does not fund non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="afsari2002">{{REFjournal
  |last=Afsari
  |last=Afsari
  |first=Mahnaz
  |first=Mahnaz
Line 84: Line 84:
Four medical groups condemned the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision of children in 2002.<ref>{{REFnews
Four medical groups condemned the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision of children in 2002.<ref>{{REFnews
  |title=Quick snip' an unkind cut
  |title=Quick snip' an unkind cut
  |url=http://www.cirp.org/news/dominionpost08-30-02/
  |url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2002/2002-08-30_dominionpost.php
  |last=Anonymous
  |last=Anonymous
  |first=
  |first=
Line 92: Line 92:
  |date=2002-08-30
  |date=2002-08-30
  |accessdate=2019-10-28
  |accessdate=2019-10-28
  |quote=
  |quote=They say circumcision is painful, risky and often medically unnecessary.
}}</ref>
}}</ref>