Difference between revisions of "Regret men"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Create page.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' are formerly [[intact]] men who, as an adult, voluntarily elected to submit to [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| adult circumcision]]. | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' are formerly [[intact]] men who, as an adult, voluntarily elected to submit to [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| adult circumcision]]. | ||
| − | Regret men usually had thoughtful and loving parents who actively protected the | + | Regret men usually had thoughtful and loving parents who actively protected the legal and [[human rights]] of their son to [[physical integrity]] and the enjoyment of a whole and complete [[intact]] [[penis]] with a functional [[foreskin]]. |
Regret men may have been reared in a society where most men are [[circumcised]] and they chose to follow the perceived norm. | Regret men may have been reared in a society where most men are [[circumcised]] and they chose to follow the perceived norm. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Others may have consulted a rapacious urologist for a minor medical condition who recommended the most expensive procedure (circumcision), instead of conservative treatment. | Others may have consulted a rapacious urologist for a minor medical condition who recommended the most expensive procedure (circumcision), instead of conservative treatment. | ||
| + | Regret men commonly complain of the discomfort of an exposed [[glans penis]] and of extreme loss of sexual sensation after the excision of the nerve-laden [[foreskin]], which has long been known to be erogenous tissue.<ref name="winklemann1959">{{REFjournal | ||
| + | |last=Winkelmann | ||
| + | |init=RK | ||
| + | |author-link= | ||
| + | |title=The erogenous zones: their nerve supply and significance | ||
| + | |journal=Mayo Clin Proc | ||
| + | |date=1959-01-21 | ||
| + | |volume=34 | ||
| + | |issue=3 | ||
| + | |pages=39-47 | ||
| + | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/winkelmann/ | ||
| + | |quote= | ||
| + | |pubmedID=13645790 | ||
| + | |pubmedCID= | ||
| + | |DOI= | ||
| + | |accessdate=2021-06-04 | ||
| + | }}</ref> | ||
| + | ==Options for treatment of lost foreskin== | ||
| + | The options for treatment are few. [[Surgical foreskin restoration]] has been tried but is no longer recommended. Men, seeking to undo the unfortunate results of their circumcision, may opt for non-surgical [[foreskin restoration]], which uses [[tissue expansion]] to elongate the residual shaft skin to form a new foreskin. It is claimed that it restores about 80 percent of the lost sensation. | ||
| + | Other regret men are awaiting the hoped for success of [[Foregen]] to regenerate a missing foreskin as a salamander regenerates its lost tail. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{REF}} | ||
[[Category:Regret]] | [[Category:Regret]] | ||
[[Category:Term]] | [[Category:Term]] | ||
Revision as of 15:03, 31 October 2022
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Regret men are formerly intact men who, as an adult, voluntarily elected to submit to adult circumcision.
Regret men usually had thoughtful and loving parents who actively protected the legal and human rights of their son to physical integrity and the enjoyment of a whole and complete intact penis with a functional foreskin.
Regret men may have been reared in a society where most men are circumcised and they chose to follow the perceived norm.
Other regret men may have been persuaded by an ignorant and selfish girl friend to get circumcised.
Others may have consulted a rapacious urologist for a minor medical condition who recommended the most expensive procedure (circumcision), instead of conservative treatment.
Regret men commonly complain of the discomfort of an exposed glans penis and of extreme loss of sexual sensation after the excision of the nerve-laden foreskin, which has long been known to be erogenous tissue.[1]
Options for treatment of lost foreskin
The options for treatment are few. Surgical foreskin restoration has been tried but is no longer recommended. Men, seeking to undo the unfortunate results of their circumcision, may opt for non-surgical foreskin restoration, which uses tissue expansion to elongate the residual shaft skin to form a new foreskin. It is claimed that it restores about 80 percent of the lost sensation.
Other regret men are awaiting the hoped for success of Foregen to regenerate a missing foreskin as a salamander regenerates its lost tail.
References
- ↑
Winkelmann RK. The erogenous zones: their nerve supply and significance. Mayo Clin Proc. 21 January 1959; 34(3): 39-47. PMID. Retrieved 4 June 2021.
