Difference between revisions of "Necrosis"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add text and citation.)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
  
−
The [[Plastibell]] and [[Prepex]] circumcision devices intentionalal cause necrosis of the foreskin by ischaemia, which causes the [[foreskin]] to die and fall off.
+
The [[Plastibell]], [[Prepex]], and [[TARA KLamp]] circumcision devices intentionally cause necrosis of the foreskin by ischaemia, which causes the [[foreskin]] to die and fall off.
  
−
Necrosis is a rare complication of [[circumcision]].
+
Necrosis is a complication of [[circumcision]]. [[Rosemary Romberg]] (2021) reported necrosis of the glans due to overly tight bandage or a Plastibell ring that was too small.<ref>{{REFbook
 +
|last=Romberg
 +
|first=Rosemary
 +
|init=
 +
|author-link=Rosemary Romberg
 +
|year=2021
 +
|title=Circumcision — The Painful Dilemma
 +
|url=https://circumcisionthepainfuldilemma.wordpress.com/
 +
|work=
 +
|editor=[[Ulf Dunkel]]
 +
|edition=Second Edition, Revised
 +
|volume=
 +
|chapter=Glans Necrosis
 +
|scope=
 +
|page=278
 +
|pages=
 +
|location=
 +
|publisher=Kindle
 +
|ISBN=23: 979-8683021252
 +
|quote=
 +
|accessdate=2023-08-31
 +
|note=
 +
}}</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Therapy==
 +
Tasci et al. (2020) surveyed the medico-legal aspects of post-circumcision necrosis. Information on 24 cases was collected. The patients were treated for necrosis by surgical intervention in 15 (62.5%) patients, hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) in 6 (25%), the conservative approach in 2 (8.3%), and HBOT plus surgical intervention in 1 (4.1%) patient.<ref name="tasci2020">{{REFjournal
 +
|last=Tasci
 +
|first=
 +
|init=AI
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=Danacioglu
 +
|first2=
 +
|init2=YO
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|last3=Arikan
 +
|first3=
 +
|init3=Y
 +
|author3-link=
 +
|etal=yes
 +
|title=Management of post-circumcision necrosis of the penis: the medicolegal aspect
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal= Pediatr Surg Int
 +
|location=
 +
|date=2020-04
 +
|volume=36
 +
|issue=4
 +
|article=
 +
|page=
 +
|pages=523-8
 +
|url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00383-020-04630-2
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=32088740
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=10.1007/s00383-020-04630-2
 +
|accessdate=2022-01-20
 +
}}</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Case reports==
 +
Sterenberg et al. (1981) reported a case of necrosis of the [[glans penis]] after [[Brit Milah| ritual circumcision]] of a ten-day-old boy by a [[mohel]]. The boy had a blackened glans penis. He was hospitalized but the necrotic glans penis fell off.<ref name="sternberg1981">{{REFjournal
 +
|last=Sterberg
 +
|first=
 +
|init=N
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=Golan
 +
|first2=
 +
|init2=J
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|last3=Ben-Hur
 +
|first3=
 +
|init3=N
 +
|author3-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Necrosis of the Glans Penis Following Neonatal Circumcision
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal= Plast Reconstr Surg
 +
|location=
 +
|date=1981-08
 +
|volume=68
 +
|issue=2
 +
|article=
 +
|page=
 +
|pages=237-9
 +
|url=https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/citation/1981/08000/necrosis_of_the_glans_penis_following_neonatal.22.aspx
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=7255584
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=10.1097/00006534-198108000-00022
 +
|accessdate=2022-01-10
 +
}}</ref>
 +
 
 +
Barnes et al. (2006) reported the case of a two-week-old male infant who developed glans necrosis after a non-therapeutic circumcision. The boy is reported to have suffered only cosmetic damage with no functional impairment expected.<ref name="barnes2006">{{REFjournal
 +
|last=Barnes
 +
|first=Sophie
 +
|init=
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=Ben Chaim
 +
|first2=Jacob
 +
|init2=
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|last3=Kessler
 +
|first3=Ada
 +
|init3=
 +
|author3-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Postcircumcision necrosis of the glans penis: Gray-scale and color doppler sonographic findings
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=J Clin Ultrasound
 +
|location=
 +
|date=2007-02
 +
|volume=35
 +
|issue=2
 +
|article=
 +
|page=
 +
|pages=105-7
 +
|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jcu.20271
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=17195193
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=10.1002/jcu.20271.
 +
|accessdate=2022-01-20
 +
}}</ref>
  
 
Aminsharifi et al. (2013) reported two cases of glans necrosis after circumcision.<ref name="aminsharifi2013">{{REFjournal
 
Aminsharifi et al. (2013) reported two cases of glans necrosis after circumcision.<ref name="aminsharifi2013">{{REFjournal
Line 53: Line 179:
 
  |accessdate=2022-01-19
 
  |accessdate=2022-01-19
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
 +
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
  
−
[[Category:Term]]
+
[[Category:Medical term]]
 
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
 
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
 +
 +
[[de:Nekrose]]

Latest revision as of 14:43, 3 September 2023

Necrosis means [d]eath of cells through injury or disease, especially in a localized area of a tissue or organ.[1]

The Plastibell, Prepex, and TARA KLamp circumcision devices intentionally cause necrosis of the foreskin by ischaemia, which causes the foreskin to die and fall off.

Necrosis is a complication of circumcision. Rosemary Romberg (2021) reported necrosis of the glans due to overly tight bandage or a Plastibell ring that was too small.[2]

Therapy

Tasci et al. (2020) surveyed the medico-legal aspects of post-circumcision necrosis. Information on 24 cases was collected. The patients were treated for necrosis by surgical intervention in 15 (62.5%) patients, hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) in 6 (25%), the conservative approach in 2 (8.3%), and HBOT plus surgical intervention in 1 (4.1%) patient.[3]

Case reports

Sterenberg et al. (1981) reported a case of necrosis of the glans penis after ritual circumcision of a ten-day-old boy by a mohel. The boy had a blackened glans penis. He was hospitalized but the necrotic glans penis fell off.[4]

Barnes et al. (2006) reported the case of a two-week-old male infant who developed glans necrosis after a non-therapeutic circumcision. The boy is reported to have suffered only cosmetic damage with no functional impairment expected.[5]

Aminsharifi et al. (2013) reported two cases of glans necrosis after circumcision.[6]

References

  1. ↑ REFweb (2007). Necrosis, The Free Dictionary. Retrieved 19 January 2022.
  2. ↑ REFbook Romberg, Rosemary (2021): Glans Necrosis, in: Circumcision — The Painful Dilemma. Ulf Dunkel (ed.). Edition: Second Edition, Revised. Kindle. P. 278. ISBN 23: 979-8683021252. Retrieved 31 August 2023.
  3. ↑ REFjournal Tasci AI, Danacioglu YO, Arikan Y, et al. Management of post-circumcision necrosis of the penis: the medicolegal aspect. Pediatr Surg Int. April 2020; 36(4): 523-8. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  4. ↑ REFjournal Sterberg N, Golan J, Ben-Hur N. Necrosis of the Glans Penis Following Neonatal Circumcision. Plast Reconstr Surg. August 1981; 68(2): 237-9. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
  5. ↑ REFjournal Barnes, Sophie, Ben Chaim, Jacob, Kessler, Ada. Postcircumcision necrosis of the glans penis: Gray-scale and color doppler sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound. February 2007; 35(2): 105-7. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  6. ↑ REFjournal Aminsharifi A, Afsar F, Tourchi A. Delayed Glans Necrosis after Circumcision: Role of Testosterone in Salvaging Glans. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. September 2013; 80(9): 791-3. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 19 January 2022.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Necrosis&oldid=34026"