Circumcision risks: Difference between revisions
m added Statistical risks (Dr. Momma) |
m normalize et al. (AMA) |
||
| Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
|date=2016-12-21 | |date=2016-12-21 | ||
|accessdate=2020-11-24 | |accessdate=2020-11-24 | ||
}}</ref> Thorup | }}</ref> Thorup et al. (2013) report that '''about 5.1%''' of the recorded complications were significant complications.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Thorup | |last=Thorup | ||
|init=J | |init=J | ||
| Line 193: | Line 193: | ||
|pubmedID=23905566 | |pubmedID=23905566 | ||
|accessdate=2020-11-24 | |accessdate=2020-11-24 | ||
}}</ref> Zöller | }}</ref> Zöller et al. (2014) analyzed patient data in a retrospective and find that '''the complication rate after male circumcision is relevant'''.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Zöller | |last=Zöller | ||
|init=C | |init=C | ||
| Line 264: | Line 264: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Okeke | Okeke et al. (2006) investigated the incidence of circumcision complications in Ibadan, Nigeria. They reported a complication rate of '''20.2 percent'''<ref ="okeke2006">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Okeke | |last=Okeke | ||
|first=Linus | |first=Linus | ||
| Line 296: | Line 296: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Lau | Lau et al. (2018) used the Utah [http://stats.health.utah.gov/about-the-data/ All-Payer Claims Database] to determine the incidence of circumcision and the percentage of complications for the state of Utah. The authors reported an incidence of neonatal circumcision of in Utah of '''29 percent''' and an incidence of complications of '''11.5 percent'''.<ref name="lau2018">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Lau | |last=Lau | ||
|first=Glen | |first=Glen | ||