Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m normalize et al. (AMA)
Wikify "Foreskinned".
Line 38: Line 38:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Foreskinned doctors tend to write papers hostile to circumcision, while [[circumcised doctors]] tend to write papers in favor of circumcision.<ref name="hill2007" /> Consequently, the medical literature regarding male circumcision is highly polarized, argumentative, and [[Bias| biased]]. American doctors do research to find reasons to carry out non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="fleiss1999">{{REFbook
[[Foreskinned]] doctors tend to write papers hostile to circumcision, while [[circumcised doctors]] tend to write papers in favor of circumcision.<ref name="hill2007" /> Consequently, the medical literature regarding male circumcision is highly polarized, argumentative, and [[Bias| biased]]. American doctors do research to find reasons to carry out non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="fleiss1999">{{REFbook
  |last=Fleiss
  |last=Fleiss
  |first=Paul  
  |first=Paul  
Line 624: Line 624:
  |accessdate=2020-08-03
  |accessdate=2020-08-03
}}
}}


[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision]] (DOC) is a non-profit, educational organization.  It does not earn money from performing non-therapeutic circumcision and is not biased by [[financial incentive]]. DOC rejects all of the self-serving statements from the medical trade associations and endorses a statement by the non-profit [http://www.icgi.org/ Coalition for Genital Integrity] (ICGI).
[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision]] (DOC) is a non-profit, educational organization.  It does not earn money from performing non-therapeutic circumcision and is not biased by [[financial incentive]]. DOC rejects all of the self-serving statements from the medical trade associations and endorses a statement by the non-profit [http://www.icgi.org/ Coalition for Genital Integrity] (ICGI).