IntactiWiki

Alleged reasons for circumcision: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,834 edits
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,834 edits
m wikify Miller & Snyder
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,834 edits
m wikify McDonald
Line 49: Line 49:
* Paralysis of the bladder - 1875: [[Lewis Albert Sayre|Lewis A. Sayre]]<ref name="Sayre1875"/>
* Paralysis of the bladder - 1875: [[Lewis Albert Sayre|Lewis A. Sayre]]<ref name="Sayre1875"/>


In 1958, [[C. F. McDonald]] said "the same reasons that apply for the circumcision of males are generally valid when considered for the female."<ref name="McDonald1958">{{REFjournal
In 1958, [[Christine F. McDonald]] said "the same reasons that apply for the circumcision of males are generally valid when considered for the female."<ref name="McDonald1958">{{McDonald1958}}</ref>
|last=McDonald
|init=CF
|title=Circumcision of the female
|journal=General Practitioner
|date=1958-09
|volume=18
|issue=3
|pages=98-99
}}</ref>


In 1966, Masters and Johnson erroneous claim that there is no difference in sensitivity between penises with and without foreskin.
In 1966, Masters and Johnson erroneous claim that there is no difference in sensitivity between penises with and without foreskin.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Alleged_reasons_for_circumcision"