Andrew Gross: Difference between revisions

Line 38:

}}</ref>

}}

This "mission" clearly shows that he absolutely believes in a [[Parental rights|parental right]] of choice for genital [[mutilation]] of minors without any medical indication. This way he totally ignores the parental duty to protect children from harm. Circumcision promoters like him often totally ignore the [[human rights]] of the child. He even ignores the physical fact that "circumcision" aka [[foreskin]] [[amputation]] is always genital [[mutilation]] by definition.<ref name="IW">{{REFweb

|url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/intactwiki2

Line 45:

Line 46:

|accessdate=2021-08-03

}}</ref>

=== No choice for human rights violations ===

The approach of Gross and Circumcision Choice that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without medical indication for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on the Circumcision Choice website should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.

== Guessed reasons for his engagement ==

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 }}</ref>
 }}
 This "mission" clearly shows that he absolutely believes in a [[Parental rights|parental right]] of choice for genital [[mutilation]] of minors without any medical indication. This way he totally ignores the parental duty to protect children from harm. Circumcision promoters like him often totally ignore the [[human rights]] of the child. He even ignores the physical fact that "circumcision" aka [[foreskin]] [[amputation]] is always genital [[mutilation]] by definition.<ref name="IW">{{REFweb
   |url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/intactwiki2
@@ Line 45: / Line 46: @@
   |accessdate=2021-08-03
 }}</ref>
+=== No choice for human rights violations ===
+The approach of Gross and Circumcision Choice that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without medical indication for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on the Circumcision Choice website should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.
 == Guessed reasons for his engagement ==