Rights situation on circumcision: Difference between revisions

Line 108:

=== USA ===

In 2007, the Oregon Supreme Court, ruled, in the case of [[Boldt v. Boldt]], that the 12-year-old boy must be consulted to determine if he wants to be circumcised.

In 2007, the Oregon Supreme Court, ruled, in the case of [[Boldt v. Boldt]], that the 12-year-old boy must be consulted to determine if he wants to be [[circumcised]].

In the autumn of 2010, Californian intactivists called for a ban of non-therapeutic infant circumcision and thereby sparked a nation-wide discussion of the topic.

In the autumn of 2010, Californian [[intactivists]] called for a ban of non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]] and thereby sparked a nation-wide discussion of the topic.

The USA have by far the highest rate of circumcision among the western nations. In many maternity wards non-therapeutic circumcision of newborn boys is common. Circumcision is considered a profit center for many U.S. hospitals. The US pediatric ~~society~~, [[AAP]], ~~is the only major medical society in the world still advocating the~~ non-therapeutic circumcision of newborns and children, however it must be noted that the AAP's 2012 circumcision position statement expired in 2017 and has not been reaffirmed, so the present position of the AAP is unclear.

The USA have by far the highest rate of circumcision among the western nations. In many maternity wards non-therapeutic circumcision of newborn boys is common. Circumcision is considered a profit center for many U.S. hospitals. The US pediatric [[medical trade association]], [[AAP]], has withdrawn its advocacy of non-therapeutic circumcision of newborns and children, however it must be noted that the AAP's 2012 circumcision position statement expired in 2017 and has not been reaffirmed, so the present position of the AAP is unclear.

• • •

@@ Line 108: / Line 108: @@
 === USA ===
-In 2007, the Oregon Supreme Court, ruled, in the case of [[Boldt v. Boldt]], that the 12-year-old boy must be consulted to determine if he wants to be circumcised.
+In 2007, the Oregon Supreme Court, ruled, in the case of [[Boldt v. Boldt]], that the 12-year-old boy must be consulted to determine if he wants to be [[circumcised]].
-In the autumn of 2010, Californian intactivists called for a ban of non-therapeutic infant circumcision and thereby sparked a nation-wide discussion of the topic.
+In the autumn of 2010, Californian [[intactivists]] called for a ban of non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]] and thereby sparked a nation-wide discussion of the topic.
-The USA have by far the highest rate of circumcision among the western nations. In many maternity wards non-therapeutic circumcision of newborn boys is common. Circumcision is considered a profit center for many U.S. hospitals. The US pediatric society, [[AAP]], is the only major medical society in the world still advocating the non-therapeutic circumcision of newborns and children, however it must be noted that the AAP's 2012 circumcision position statement expired in 2017 and has not been reaffirmed, so the present position of the AAP is unclear.
+The USA have by far the highest rate of circumcision among the western nations. In many maternity wards non-therapeutic circumcision of newborn boys is common. Circumcision is considered a profit center for many U.S. hospitals. The US pediatric [[medical trade association]], [[AAP]], has withdrawn its advocacy of non-therapeutic circumcision of newborns and children, however it must be noted that the AAP's 2012 circumcision position statement expired in 2017 and has not been reaffirmed, so the present position of the AAP is unclear.
 • • •