Difference between revisions of "Regret men"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (→Reasons for circumcision) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Revise text.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' are formerly [[intact]] men who, as an adult, voluntarily elected to submit to [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| adult circumcision]]. | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' are formerly [[intact]] men who, as an adult, voluntarily elected to submit to [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| adult circumcision]]. | ||
| − | Regret men usually had thoughtful and loving parents who actively protected the legal and [[human rights]] of their son to [[physical integrity]] and the enjoyment of a whole and complete [[intact]] [[penis]] with a functional [[foreskin]]. | + | Regret men usually had thoughtful and loving parents who actively protected the legal and [[human rights]] of their son to [[physical integrity]] and the enjoyment of a whole and complete [[intact]] [[penis]] with a functional [[foreskin]]. Such parents reserve the decision regarding [[circumcision]] for the boy to make for himself. |
==Reasons for circumcision== | ==Reasons for circumcision== | ||
Regret men may have been reared in a society where most men are [[circumcised]] and they chose to follow the perceived norm. | Regret men may have been reared in a society where most men are [[circumcised]] and they chose to follow the perceived norm. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Others may have consulted a rapacious urologist for a minor medical condition who recommended the most expensive procedure ([[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]]), instead of conservative foreskin-conserving treatment. | Others may have consulted a rapacious urologist for a minor medical condition who recommended the most expensive procedure ([[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]]), instead of conservative foreskin-conserving treatment. | ||
| − | + | After their circumcision, regret men commonly complain of the discomfort of an exposed [[glans penis]] and of extreme loss of sexual sensation after the excision of the nerve-laden [[foreskin]], which has been known to be erogenous tissue for decades.<ref name="winklemann1959">{{REFjournal | |
|last=Winkelmann | |last=Winkelmann | ||
|init=RK | |init=RK | ||
Revision as of 12:46, 1 November 2022
Regret men are formerly intact men who, as an adult, voluntarily elected to submit to adult circumcision.
Regret men usually had thoughtful and loving parents who actively protected the legal and human rights of their son to physical integrity and the enjoyment of a whole and complete intact penis with a functional foreskin. Such parents reserve the decision regarding circumcision for the boy to make for himself.
Contents
Reasons for circumcision
Regret men may have been reared in a society where most men are circumcised and they chose to follow the perceived norm.
Other regret men may have been persuaded by an ignorant and selfish girlfriend or ex-girlfriend to get circumcised.
Others may have consulted a rapacious urologist for a minor medical condition who recommended the most expensive procedure ( circumcision), instead of conservative foreskin-conserving treatment.
After their circumcision, regret men commonly complain of the discomfort of an exposed glans penis and of extreme loss of sexual sensation after the excision of the nerve-laden foreskin, which has been known to be erogenous tissue for decades.[1]
Options for treatment of lost foreskin
The options for treatment are few. Surgical foreskin restoration has been tried but is no longer recommended. Men, seeking to undo the unfortunate results of their circumcision, may opt for non-surgical foreskin restoration, which uses tissue expansion to elongate the residual shaft skin to form a new foreskin. It is claimed that it restores about 80 percent of the lost sensation.
Other regret men are awaiting the hoped for success of Foregen to regenerate a missing foreskin as a salamander regenerates its lost tail.
Other classes of regret men
Other classes of regret men include the regret dad, the male regret doctor who regrets the circumcisions he formerly performed, and cut (circumcised) dads with intact sons.
See also
References
- ↑
Winkelmann RK. The erogenous zones: their nerve supply and significance. Mayo Clin Proc. 21 January 1959; 34(3): 39-47. PMID. Retrieved 4 June 2021.
