Abraham L. Wolbarst: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Abraham L. Wolbarst.jpg|right|thumb|Abraham Leo Wolbarst]] | [[Image:Abraham L. Wolbarst.jpg|right|thumb|Abraham Leo Wolbarst]] | ||
'''Abraham Leo Wolbarst''', {{MD}}, ({{LifeData|1872|1952}}) a New York City physician, was a notorious promoter of non-therapeutic neonatal male [[circumcision]]. | '''Abraham Leo Wolbarst''', {{MD}}, ({{LifeData|1872|1952}}) a New York City physician and [[circumcised doctors| circumcised doctor]], was a notorious promoter of harmful non-therapeutic neonatal male [[circumcision]]. | ||
==Universal circumcision as a sanitary measure== | ==Universal circumcision as a sanitary measure== | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|title=Universal Circumcision as a Sanitary Measure | |title=Universal Circumcision as a Sanitary Measure | ||
|journal=JAMA | |journal=JAMA | ||
|date=1914- | |date=1914-01-10 | ||
|volume=62 | |volume=62 | ||
|issue=2 | |issue=2 | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
This was before the days of evidence-based medicine, when doctors relied on medical ''opinion'', instead of scientific ''evidence''. Wolbarst collected the ''opinions'' of several physicians and published those opinions as evidence for his argument that circumcision prevented diseases. Wolbarst argued that non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision prevented numerous diseases including venereal disease (now known as sexually transmitted disease). | This was before the days of evidence-based medicine, when doctors relied on medical ''opinion'', instead of scientific ''evidence''. Wolbarst collected the ''opinions'' of several physicians and published those opinions as evidence for his argument that circumcision prevented diseases. Wolbarst argued that non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision prevented numerous diseases including venereal disease (now known as sexually transmitted disease). | ||
Skeldon (2008) commented: | Skeldon (2008) commented: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| Line 43: | Line 44: | ||
was already a commonly held view and so was not generally questioned. But if one | was already a commonly held view and so was not generally questioned. But if one | ||
considers the implications of this, it becomes apparent that to statistically prove such a | considers the implications of this, it becomes apparent that to statistically prove such a | ||
claim among young boys would be virtually impossible. This is why Wolbarst’s evidence | claim among young boys would be virtually impossible. This is why Wolbarst’s evidence | ||
consisted of what he called “authoritative observations” from other respected | |||
practitioners in the field.<ref name="skeldon2008">{{REFconference | |||
|last=Skeldon | |||
|first=Sean | |||
|author-link= | |||
|title=The Medicalization and Resultant Decline of Circumcision in Canada | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|url=https://prism.ucalgary.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/028cdb7b-3536-4b5b-921b-46ba3a2262ec/content | |||
|archived= | |||
|place=Calgary, AB | |||
|publisher=Health Sciences Centre | |||
|source= | |||
|date=2008-03 | |||
|datefrom=2008-03-07 | |||
|dateto=2008-03-08 | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|accessdate=2025-01-19 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Wolbarst's article appeared on the eve of World War I. It apparently influenced American military commanders to order [[adult circumcision| circumcision]] of military personnel under their command to prevent venereal diseases and improve military readiness.<ref name=" | Wolbarst's article appeared on the eve of World War I. It apparently influenced American military commanders to order [[adult circumcision| circumcision]] of military personnel under their command to prevent venereal diseases and improve military readiness.<ref name="skeldon2008" /> No statistics exist to document how many men were [[circumcised]] because of Wolbarst's article. | ||
The adoption of circumcision as a prophylactic [[amputation]] by American military services falsely stigmatized the [[foreskin]] as being unhealthy. [[Robert S. Van Howe|Van Howe]] (1999) has exhaustively shown that circumcision does not protect against STDs.<ref name="vanhowe1999">{{REFjournal | The adoption of circumcision as a prophylactic [[amputation]] by American military services falsely stigmatized the [[foreskin]] as being unhealthy. [[Robert S. Van Howe|Van Howe]] (1999) has exhaustively shown that circumcision does not protect against STDs.<ref name="vanhowe1999">{{REFjournal | ||