Difference between revisions of "Medical literature about foreskin restoration"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add LINKS section.)
(added interwiki link)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
Relatively little medical literature regarding [[foreskin restoration]] for [[circumcised]] men exists. The reasons for this are two-fold:  
 
Relatively little medical literature regarding [[foreskin restoration]] for [[circumcised]] men exists. The reasons for this are two-fold:  
−
* Foreskin restoration embarrasses and discredits the [[circumcision industry]] as it tries to make [[Financial incentive| as much money as it can]] from [[genital mutilation]] of boys.
+
* Foreskin restoration embarrasses and discredits the [[circumcision industry]] as it tries to make [[Financial incentive| as much money as it can]] from [[genital mutilation]] of boys.<ref name="bollinger2012">{{REFweb
 +
|url=https://www.academia.edu/6442587/High_Cost_of_Circumcision_3.6_Billion_Annually
 +
|title=High Cost of Circumcision: $3.6 Billion Annually
 +
|last=Bollinger
 +
|first=Dan
 +
|author-link=Dan Bollinger
 +
|publisher=Academia
 +
|website=https://www.academia.edu
 +
|date=2012
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-21
 +
|format=
 +
|quote=As the saying goes, follow the money. Now you know why neither the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]], American Medical Association, [[American Academy of Family Physicians]], or the [[American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] haven’t condemned this unnecessary surgery, and why their physician members are quick to recommend the procedure to expectant parents.
 +
}}</ref>
 
* Most of the development of non-surgical [[foreskin restoration]] has been done by non-medical organizations such as [[BUFF]].<ref>{{REFjournal
 
* Most of the development of non-surgical [[foreskin restoration]] has been done by non-medical organizations such as [[BUFF]].<ref>{{REFjournal
 
  |last=Özer
 
  |last=Özer
Line 367: Line 379:
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-13
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-13
 
}}
 
}}
 +
* {{REFbook
 +
|last=Bigelow
 +
|first=
 +
|init=J
 +
|author-link=Jim Bigelow
 +
|year=1994, 1998
 +
|title=The Joy of Uncircumcising
 +
|url=https://www.amazon.com/The-Joy-Uncircumcising-Circumcision-Restoration/dp/093406122X
 +
|scope=
 +
|location=
 +
|publisher=Hourglass Book Publishing
 +
|ISBN=978-0934061223
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-25
 +
}}
 
* {{REFjournal
 
* {{REFjournal
 
  |last=Bigelow
 
  |last=Bigelow
Line 408: Line 434:
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-13
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-13
 
}}
 
}}
−
 
+
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last=Zöllner
 +
|first=Alexander M.
 +
|init=AM
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=Tepole
 +
|init2=AB
 +
|last3=Kuhl
 +
|init3=E
 +
|title=On the biomechanics and mechanobiology of growing skin
 +
|journal=Theoretical Biology
 +
|date=2012
 +
|volume=297
 +
|pages=166-75
 +
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278515/
 +
|pubmedID=3278515
 +
|pubmedCID=22227432
 +
|DOI=10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.12.022
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-25
 +
}}</ref>
 
* {{REFjournal
 
* {{REFjournal
 
  |last=Özer
 
  |last=Özer
Line 678: Line 723:
 
* [[Restoration]]
 
* [[Restoration]]
 
* [[Restored foreskin]]
 
* [[Restored foreskin]]
 +
 
{{LINKS}}
 
{{LINKS}}
−
The Cleveland Clinic (2023) has belatedly recognized the existence of both surgical and non-surgical foreskin restoration.
+
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last=Narvaez
 +
|init=DF
 +
|author-link=Darcia Narvaez
 +
|url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201506/practical-tips-men-distressed-their-circumcision
 +
|title=Practical Tips for Men Distressed by Their Circumcision
 +
|journal=Psychology Today
 +
|date=2015-06-21
 +
|volume=
 +
|issue=
 +
|pages=
 +
|quote=One of the (many) problems with circumcision is that circumcised men often suffer in silence, for fear of being thought weak or weird if they complain.
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-28
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
The [https://my.clevelandclinic.org/ Cleveland Clinic] (2023) has belatedly recognized the existence of both surgical and non-surgical foreskin restoration:
 
* {{REFweb
 
* {{REFweb
 
  |title=Foreskin Restoration
 
  |title=Foreskin Restoration
Line 697: Line 758:
 
  |quote=Restoring your foreskin is a personal decision, and there are many reasons why you may want to do it. Most people who wish to restore their foreskin want the appearance of an uncircumcised penis. It can also make you feel good to reclaim decisions about your body.
 
  |quote=Restoring your foreskin is a personal decision, and there are many reasons why you may want to do it. Most people who wish to restore their foreskin want the appearance of an uncircumcised penis. It can also make you feel good to reclaim decisions about your body.
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
−
 
  
 
[[Category:Foreskin restoration]]
 
[[Category:Foreskin restoration]]
Line 705: Line 766:
 
[[Category:Penile function]]
 
[[Category:Penile function]]
 
[[Category:Physiology]]
 
[[Category:Physiology]]
 +
 +
[[de:Medizinische Literatur über Vorhautrestaurierung]]

Latest revision as of 19:53, 9 April 2025

This page collects and indexes medical literature about foreskin restoration. This page does not include material from ancient times.

Work in progress: The following information does not claim to be complete. More content will be added gradually.

Contents

Introduction

Foreskin restoration may be done surgically or non-surgically by tissue expansion. Also, foreskin regeneration is under development.

Relatively little medical literature regarding foreskin restoration for circumcised men exists. The reasons for this are two-fold:

Surgical foreskin restoration

Surgical foreskin restoration was developed earlier than non-surgical foreskin restoration.

Articles

Non-surgical foreskin restoration

Non-surgical foreskin restoration is accomplished by stimulating mitosis in the residual tissue to cause tissue expansion.

Articles

Foreskin regeneration

Foreskin regeneration is a relatively new and experimental procedure with the application of the principles of tissue engineering to regeneration of missing foreskins, which Foregen is attempting to develop. The publications to date have been limited. The available articles report on the development of a procedure, not the actual performance of foreskin regeneration, which has not been reported as of June 2024.

Articles

See also

External links

The Cleveland Clinic (2023) has belatedly recognized the existence of both surgical and non-surgical foreskin restoration:

  •   Anonymous (23 July 2023). Foreskin Restoration, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/, Cleveland Clinic. Retrieved 21 June 2024.
    Quote: Restoring your foreskin is a personal decision, and there are many reasons why you may want to do it. Most people who wish to restore their foreskin want the appearance of an uncircumcised penis. It can also make you feel good to reclaim decisions about your body.

References

  1. ↑   Bollinger, Dan (2012). High Cost of Circumcision: $3.6 Billion Annually, https://www.academia.edu, Academia. Retrieved 21 June 2024.
    Quote: As the saying goes, follow the money. Now you know why neither the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Medical Association, American Academy of Family Physicians, or the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists haven’t condemned this unnecessary surgery, and why their physician members are quick to recommend the procedure to expectant parents.
  2. ↑   Özer M, Timmermans FW. ‘An insight into circumcised men seeking foreskin reconstruction: a prospective cohort study’. Int J Impot Res. November 2020; 32(6): 611-6. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 19 June 2024.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Medical_literature_about_foreskin_restoration&oldid=41592"